Meet the man who figures Apple is worth $240 a share

What does David Trainer know about Apple that nobody else does?

Trainer via LinkedIn.

FORTUNE -- At Credit Suisse, where he spent four years in the late 1990s, David Trainer was given what a former colleague called "a nearly impossible task -- teach and convince a department of 50+ very senior analysts a better way to think about valuing their companies."

Now Trainer is trying to teach the rest of the world that "better way," and this week he executed a neat media triple play -- MarketWatch, MoneyLife and CNBC -- pitching a model based on ROIC (return on invested capital) that values Apple (AAPL) at $240 a share.

It's hard to believe a little-known Nashville trader with an obscure theory and a bizarre Apple valuation could move a market. But shortly after his media blitz began Tuesday, Apple's share price dropped more than $9. After his CNBC appearance Wednesday it fell another $21 to dip below $423 -- thus wiping out two and a half weeks of gains.

I watched Trainer's CNBC appearance (best line: "Steve Jobs was the Bo Jackson of CEOs"). I read his blog post. I looked up ROIC in Investopedia. I studied his Apple model.

I couldn't make any sense of it. Maybe you can.

Posted in: Apple, David Trainer, Return on invested capital, ROIC, valuation

• Why LinkedIn fiddles as Facebook burns

  The professional social network was seen as sexless compared to Facebook. Now it just seems safe.

  By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

  FORTUNE -- Amid the anger this week of Facebook investors, the embarrassment of the company's underwriters and the schadenfreude of its detractors, a question has been bugging me: If so many investors are skeptical of Facebook's (FB) overvalued IPO, then why are they still so positive on LinkedIn (LNKD)?

  Like Facebook, LinkedIn MORE

  May 24, 2012 10:28 AM ET
  Posted in: Facebook, FB, IPO, LinkedIn, LNKD, social media, social network, Stock, valuation

• The problem with LinkedIn's stock price

  After a spectacular IPO, LinkedIn's stock has lost nearly half its value. Yet it's still trading at 300 times its 2012 earnings. So why are Wall Street analysts recommending you buy it?

  By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

  FORTUNE -- The fears of another technology-stock bubble that prevailed in the first half of the year have faded away in the second half as a concerns about Europe's financial stability took the speculative wind out MORE

  Dec 12, 2011 12:07 PM ET
  Posted in: Analysts, bubble, dot-com, IPO, LinkedIn, valuation, Wall Street