FORTUNE -- To AOL CEO Tim Armstrong, Silicon Valley is a "pig pile" where every company is copying every other company. "Everyone is putting out the same services, the devices have become more commoditized, and the platforms are the same," he said Thursday during a presentation at the Paley Center for Media in New York.
Sounding a bit like a Web-media executive from 1998, Armstrong basically put forth the idea that, as a lot of people said back then, "content is king."
That might sound a bit quaint in this era of ad rates falling with breathtaking speed and many Web publishers stretching the limits of propriety to draw page views and generate revenue. But Armstrong is a true believer, and he believes that "content," more than gadgets and more than platforms, will be what drives communications technology. AOL's (AOL) aim is to be the "arms dealer to Silicon Valley," he said.
Somewhat overblown rhetoric, to be sure. But it's hard to count Armstrong and AOL out entirely. The Huffington Post is succeeding better than most Web publishers (thanks in large part to sheer scale), and the company's stock is up by 109% over the past year. Lately, it has been outpacing the stock of most other media companies.
Much of the boost in share price is attributable to the patents AOL sold to Microsoft (MSFT) for $1.1 billion. But that was a year ago, and the upward trend has continued. Another issue: profits. While revenues are up for the first time in eight years, the company's profits come mainly not from its media properties, but from the high-margin business of continuing to collect revenue from people who are still using AOL's dial-up Internet service. Demographics alone spell eventual doom for that business, and over time AOL will be increasingly reliant on the highly uncertain and risk-riddled business of Web publishing.
One of the company's riskier continued bets is on Patch, its network of local-news sites. It continues to bleed money, to some degree because even struggling local newspapers often have larger staffs, more-complete coverage, and better brand awareness than Patch sites can manage. Armstrong argues that Patch gets a bad rap in the media because journalists are put off by its sometimes-iffy ethical practices, such as when it makes journalists directly responsible for generating ad revenue. "The journalism world pounds on Patch," he said. But that argument might carry more weight if shareholders didn't pound on Patch even more. He insists that Patch is a good long-term play.
A big question at the Paley Center was whether AOL might be interested in acquiring Time-Warner's (TWX) stable of magazines. It was announced this week that the titles that once made up Time, Inc., -- including Fortune, Time, Sports Illustrated, and People -- will be spun off into a separate company, perhaps as soon as the end of this year. But that's a non-starter for AOL, which can't afford any major acquisitions (estimates of the new magazine company's potential valuation put it not far below AOL's market cap of about $2.85 billion.) Armstrong sees the reality of this, but seems a bit wistful about the impossibility of reuniting with AOL's former Time-Warner cousins. He would buy them, he said, "if I had my private druthers."
The druthers of public investors, though, are paramount, at least in the case of Time Inc., if not in the case of Patch.
He mapped out a strategy to rescue the failing merger on a whiteboard in 2003
After a long meeting with Steve Jobs last year about what the iPad would mean for publishers, Fortune's technology editor Stephanie Mehta -- known to her colleagues as "Stephanie Telephony" when she covered telecommunications -- remarked that Jobs was a surprisingly astute student of other people's businesses, including hers.
Case in point: A story Brent Schlender, who covered MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 25, 2011 7:05 AM ET
Some of the most draconian restrictions in its App Store subscription rules have been lifted
Last February, when Apple (AAPL) announced the rules by which publishers and other content providers could offer subscriptions through its App Store, Steve Jobs made them sound like the most reasonable thing in the world.
"Our philosophy is simple," he wrote. "When Apple brings a new subscriber to the app, Apple earns a 30 percent share; when MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jun 9, 2011 11:05 AM ET
Tells Ad Age that the rush to put magazines on tablets is "sheer insanity and insecurity and fear"
Jann Wenner, who has done his share of celebrity interviews for Rolling Stone (Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Barack Obama, etc.), knows how to give a good one, and his Q&A in the current issue of Ad Age is a doozy.
As it happens, he spends much of it talking Apple (AAPL) and the iPad. MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 31, 2011 7:22 AM ET
Perhaps Apple's magazine subscription rules weren't as one-sided as publishers feared
If you were subscribing to the online edition of, say, Wired, Vanity Fair or the New Yorker on the iTunes store, and you were faced with the pop-up window at right, would you opt-in and click "Allow"?
Most major magazine publishers, when shown this screen by Apple (AAPL) representatives, blanched. Each of them knew full well the kind of gravy they MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 12, 2011 6:49 AM ET
Even as big publishers strike deals to put content on the iPad, a small ebookseller bites the dust
In an bitter letter to users, BeamItDown Software's Philip Huber makes no bones about whom he blames for the fate of his company and its iFlowReader app, both of which will cease operations on May 31.
"The crux of the matter is that Apple is now requiring us, as well as all other ebook MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 11, 2011 7:41 AM ET
Apple and Time Inc. struck a deal, and the per-issue price fell from $4.99 overnight
Here's a window into the economics of magazine publishing.
Monday's Wall Street Journal reports that Time Inc. (TWX) and Apple (AAPL) have reached an agreement to allow subscribers of Time, Fortune and Sports Illustrated to get digital versions of their magazines on the iPad for free.
The deal breaks an impasse that dates back to high-level meetings Steve MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 2, 2011 7:28 AM ET
Bloomberg Businessweek joins Maxim, Elle and Popular Science on the iTunes Store
The iTunes magazine subscription list grew by 33% Monday when Bloomberg L.P. agreed to Steve Jobs' terms and began offering subscriptions to the iPad version of Bloomberg Businessweek on the iTunes store.
That makes four magazine publishers willing to give Cupertino 30% of each subscription sold and take the risk that they will never know who bought it.
In return, the MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Apr 11, 2011 7:35 AM ET
The subscription model Apple announced today is unlikely to please anyone
There was a rumor in the Time Life building last week that Apple (AAPL) -- which had been in a stand-off with the publishing industry for nearly a year -- had "blinked" and was about to cut a deal favorable to the publishers.
It was not to be. When Apple announced its new App Store subscription service Tuesday morning, it was MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 15, 2011 10:28 AM ET
Zinio's digital revenues have grown 350% since last April. Will Apple put a stop to that?
When we wrote a few weeks ago about the signal failure of Apple's iPad to halt the magazine industry's downward spiral (See Why digital newsstands stink), we had forgotten about Zinio.
Zinio, which has been giving publishers a venue to sell their wares online for nearly a decade, is the exception to all the rules of MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 24, 2011 12:57 PM ET
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|What stumps Warren Buffett? Minimum wage|
|Analysts offer no apologies for missing Apple's Q2 2014 earnings beat|
|Facebook profit triples on mobile growth|
|Apple shares soar on increased buyback|