FORTUNE -- Ministry of Sound, a British music label that issues compilation albums, is suing Spotify, claiming that the song-streamer is infringing on the label's copyrights by allowing people to create and share playlists that mirror its albums.
Are lists of particular songs copyrightable? Possibly. U.S. copyright law recognizes compilations, in fact. The Copyright Act says that the "collection and assembling of preexisting materials or of data that are selected in such a way that the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship."
In other words, a particular list of songs in random or alphabetical order isn't protected, but playlists are -- or at least might be. The fact that users are assembling and sharing the playlists might change the equation in this case, as might the fact that online playlists aren't necessarily the same as compilations issued on a physical medium. The whole issue highlights how the digitization and online distribution of media changes how we view such matters, and how intellectual-property laws written for the analogue era often don't seem to make a lot of sense. If another label started issuing CDs mirroring the Ministry of Sound's compilations, it seems unlikely that anyone would be surprised if Ministry of Sound sued.
Still, from a non-legal standpoint, the suit seems rather petty. Crucially, the lawsuit has nothing to do with the songs themselves, which are all legitimately licensed to Spotify, but with the order and presentation of them. Many users apparently label their playlists with the Ministry of Sound's name. Spotify hasn't commented on the lawsuit so far.
Ministry of Sound CEO Lohan Presencer insisted in a column in the Guardian that "the value and creativity in our compilations are self-evident." He also separately told the Guardian: that "a lot of research goes into creating our compilation albums, and the intellectual property involved in that. It's not appropriate for someone to just cut and paste them."
Presencer, then, is a bit like those guys you knew in college who thought their mix tapes were Major Artistic Statements -- pretty much the equivalent of actual musicians making actual albums.
"Even if Ministry of Sound claims that 'a lot of research' went into compiling the list, what the public sees is just a list of nouns," E. Michael Harrington, a music-business professor and member of the Future of Music Coalition advisory board, told Time's Victor Luckerson. "Compiling a list of songs you like in a specific order deserves as much copyright protection as compiling a list of things one did in Manhattan today."
Harrington is right about the first part -- to most of us, a list is just a list. But he might be dead wrong about the second part. Some lists are copyrightable.
Research conducted by the company indicates that its service not only dissuades illicit downloads of music, it helps increase sales.
FORTUNE -- With the streaming-music business taking heavy fire lately for supposedly underpaying musicians, Spotify has issued research that it says proves that its streaming service reduces piracy.
The report, "Adventures in the Netherlands: Spotify, Piracy, and the new Dutch Experience," indicates that between 2008 and 2012, the percentage of people age MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Jul 19, 2013 1:09 PM ET
Twitter and Facebook aren't driving music sales online. Last.fm is. Remember Last.fm?
By Heather Muse, editor
FORTUNE -- "Be more social" is advice that pretty much every entrepreneur gets. Have a presence on Facebook. Be active on Twitter. But does that translate into sales? It's complicated.
Recent research about music sales showed a surprising social network generating an increase in sales for artists. Track plays on Last.fm, a music discovery service that has MOREJul 18, 2013 8:11 AM ET
The fight over whether music streamers like Pandora should pay less in royalties is really a debate over who in the music industry should suffer most.
FORTUNE -- It was recently suggested to me that I examine whether Tim Westergren is suddenly becoming "the new Hilary Rosen." Or in other words, this era's most-hated person in the music business.
In researching the question, I came across a more entertaining comparison: Westergren is MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Jul 18, 2013 6:47 AM ET
iTunes radio will work a lot like Pandora, but is the company too late to the big music party in the cloud?
By Ryan Bradley, senior editor
FORTUNE -- The short answer to the above question is no, the longer answer is maybe, and -- if you really want to speculate and think long-term -- the ultimate answer may be that iTunes, in terms of music listening, is irrelevant. Let's back MOREJun 11, 2013 12:57 PM ET
"iRadio" is reported to launch next week. What we know (and don't), and what we should be asking.
By Ryan Bradley, senior editor
FORTUNE -- It's a Pandora-killer; it's going to take on Spotify; it will be streaming and almost certainly free.
1. Apple upended the music industry once, can it do it again?
Probably not. The company is late to the streaming game and, besides, music -- once the core of iTunes MOREJun 4, 2013 1:04 PM ET
Its new music service -- Google Play Music All Access -- has features that are similar to both competitors.
By Ryan Bradley, senior editor
FORTUNE -- After months of buildup, on Wednesday Google announced a new, subscription-based streaming music service called Google Play Music All Access. The name may be clunky, but the offerings appear bountiful.
Google (GOOG) secured deals with three of the four major record labels—Universal Music, Sony, and Warner MOREMay 15, 2013 1:39 PM ET
Is Apple prepping a streaming music service? Nobody outside Cupertino knows. Here's strong evidence why it should.
FORTUNE -- There's no doubt that the smartphone kickstarted a revolution. But the extent to which this is true in music and other media isn't yet fully appreciated. Consider this: Some 20 million people paid for music subscriptions last year. And an estimated 80 million tap into "freemium" streaming services such as Pandora (P) and Slacker. A MOREMar 29, 2013 8:14 AM ET
Exclusive: Google is planning to roll out a music streaming service to capitalize on the power of YouTube.
By Ryan Bradley and Jessi Hempel
FORTUNE -- YouTube, the world's largest digital repository of streaming media, will launch a subscription music service later this year. The service has its own negotiating team and operating unit but will likely have some overlap with new features also rumored to be coming to Google's Android MOREMar 5, 2013 10:35 AM ET
Google and Amazon suffer a setback as the music industry, once again, puts its trust in Steve Jobs
CNET's Greg Sandoval, who reported last month that Warner Music (WMG) had signed a deal with Apple (AAPL) to make its content library available on a new music streaming service, broke the news late Thursday that EMI had also come on board and that deals with Sony (SNE) and Universal could be wrapped MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 19, 2011 7:56 AM ET
|Someone bought a $100,000 Tesla with Bitcoins|
|Economy is improving but why doesn't it feel that way?|
|Where should you put your money now?|
|2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack|
|Signing up for Obamacare doesn't mean you're insured|