Stock

IPO: May be hazardous to CEO health

March 8, 2013: 10:02 AM ET

Initial public offering side effects include first-day pop followed my painful malaise. Take with caution.

By Kevin Kelleher

130301155758-t-mason-groupon-quirky-00002311-620xb

FORTUNE – First Groupon fired Andrew Mason. Now Pandora says Joe Kennedy is leaving Pandora. Being a CEO of a company that made a splash in the public markets with high-flying IPOs is starting to look like a job hazard.

Pandora (P) priced its shares at $16 in June 2010. On its first day of trading, the stock shot up to $26 before plunging below its offering price the next day. After dipping as low as $8 a share last year, Pandora has rallied to $11.73 at yesterday's close. That's still 27% below its IPO price and 55% down from its record high.

Groupon's (GRPN) stock has followed a similar if more extreme trajectory. Offered at $20 a share, the stock surged to $31.14 in a matter of hours, then began a slow painful slide. The day Mason left Groupon, the company's stock traded as low as $4.24 a share, a 79% discount from its offering price and 86% off its fleeting, first-day high.

Looking at these two stocks, the first apparent lesson is one well-known to experienced investors: Beware the first-day pop. Once upon a time, buying a stock on the first day of trading could possibly let you in on a rally that could last months, if not weeks. But recently bearish investors have been impatient to cash in on quick gains or short stocks they believe have a brief shelf-life.

MORE: Facebook's new look can't conceal its old problems

But with more hindsight, something else is becoming clear: It seems to be getting harder for many companies to make money from the web. The business models that have resonated with consumers on a large scale simply aren't translating into businesses that can generate steady profit growth.

In the first wave of Internet startups, companies like Amazon (AMZN) and Yahoo (YHOO) posted early losses for years before moving into steady profitability. Newer companies like Google (GOOG) and Facebook (FB) have emerged capable of delivering profit margins of 20% or 30%.

But these are the exceptions. Many recent web IPOs have struggled with fleeting profits or regular quarterly losses. Compare the profit margins of Pandora and Groupon with that of Google in the chart below. Granted, Google is an older, more mature company, but when it went public it had net profit margin of 13% and a pretax margin of 20%.

profitmargins

Both Pandora and Groupon grew rapidly and gained early market share by offering discounted or ad-supported services that appealed to cost-conscious consumers in the recent recession. Both became emblematic of a new generation of startups that could entice skittish investors into new tech IPOs. Both IPOs showed that, in fact, investors still aren't hungry for companies better at growing revenue than growing profit.

Groupon's profits have been pressured by, first, high marketing costs made to fuel rapid expansion and, more recently, an aggressive move into lower-margin direct sales. Pandora's profits are hurt by the onerous fees demanded by music labels for licensing their artists under contract.

The earnings report Pandora made alongside news of the management change underscores the trend. Pandora is still growing at rates most companies would envy. Total listener hours rose 53% to top 4 billion hours last quarter. Revenue grew 54% to $125 million from the year-ago quarter. Yet the company still reported a net loss of 4 cents a share.

MORE: Apple and Google: The tables have turned

Pandora's earnings and future guidance were in line with analyst expectations, although the stock rose 21% in afterhours trading Thursday to $14.16. That may reflect optimism that a new CEO could help Pandora improve its performance. Groupon's stock saw a similar pop after Mason's departure hit the wires.

But it's not clear how a new CEO is going to be a sure-fire solution for either company. Groupon's board indicated that a seasoned executive could be needed to steer the company forward. But Kennedy is just such a seasoned hand, with several years at e-Loan and Saturn Corp. before joining Pandora in 2004. If Pandora's board feels a younger face is necessary, perhaps they can arrange a CEO swap with Groupon.

The real reason weighing down the stocks of Groupon, Pandora and many other recent IPOs is a truth investors may not want to hear. The business models themselves are troubled. Using the web to build or market a business can cut costs, but it's also trained consumers to expect -- and even shop around for -- prices to be low. Or free if ad-supported. Or, ideally, free without any ads.

And so, under pressure from investors, boards and companies are blaming CEOs. When in fact it's the business models that are problematic. The web just doesn't generate profits the way it used to.

  • Is it finally prime time for TiVo?

    After ten years of toiling in the DVR sector with a we-try-harder attitude, here's what has changed for TiVo.

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE --  A decade after it changed the way we watch TV, TIVO may be embarking on a second act.

    Founded in 1997, the Alviso, Calif., company pioneered software to manage digital video recording, or DVR. Its interface made finding and recording TV programs an intuitive experience. TiVo (TIVO) hit on MORE

    - Jan 28, 2013 9:17 AM ET
  • Apple's extra week and other anomalies in last week's report

    Stuff that went right over most analysts' -- and nearly every reporter's -- head

    FORTUNE -- As predicted, the headlines reporting Apple's (AAPL) quarterly earnings last week -- and the market's immediate and violent negative reaction -- failed to take into account that Q1 2013 had one less week Q1 2012. Even Tim Cook did lousy job explaining it.

    It fell to the Braeburn Group's Robert Paul Leitao, an independent investor who MORE

    - Jan 28, 2013 3:33 AM ET
  • Facebook: The worst may be over

    Yes, the stock price is still down, but it has staged an impressive rally. Here's why it could continue to climb.

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE -- Is the worst of the Facebook sell-off over?

    Two weeks ago, Facebook (FB) shares -- offered in May at $38 a share -- slipped as low as $25.52, a mere two bits away from fulfilling the price targets of $25 a share that some of MORE

    Jun 21, 2012 11:27 AM ET
  • Facebook's fate: Bulls versus bears

    Is Facebook entering a painful period of decline? Or, will it surge beyond its struggles? Here is the case for both.

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE – It's been more than two weeks since Facebook went public, and it's getting harder to blame the 30% drop in its market value on the trading glitch that marred its debut. Nothing, not even the many privacy controversies that have plagued Facebook's short history, MORE

    Jun 5, 2012 7:50 AM ET
  • Why LinkedIn fiddles as Facebook burns

    The professional social network was seen as sexless compared to Facebook. Now it just seems safe.

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE -- Amid the anger this week of Facebook investors, the embarrassment of the company's underwriters and the schadenfreude of its detractors, a question has been bugging me: If so many investors are skeptical of Facebook's (FB) overvalued IPO, then why are they still so positive on LinkedIn (LNKD)?

    Like Facebook, LinkedIn MORE

    May 24, 2012 10:28 AM ET
  • The problem with Zynga's growth

    Zynga has a short but rich history of defying expectations -- including its stock price which is up. So why are people so bearish on the social gaming company?

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE -- Zynga (ZNGA) has a short but rich history of defying expectations. Last summer, Zynga was expected to be worth as much as $20 billion as a public company. Turn out, it was worth $7 billion when it MORE

    Apr 2, 2012 10:43 AM ET
  • If Netflix is for sale, who should buy it?

    The struggling streaming company's stock surged on rumors Verizon might acquire it. But there are plenty of better suitors out there.

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE -- The rise of Netflix took years, but the fall is taking much less time. After enjoying a steady increase in its stock price from $5 a share in late 2002 to $305 a share this summer, the stock has plunged back to $73 a share MORE

    Dec 14, 2011 9:13 AM ET
  • Investors may regret not warming up to Microsoft

    All investors seem to want is a bigger piece of the company's $53 billion cash pile. They'd do better to pay attention to what Windows 8 and Windows Phone really mean.

    By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

    FORTUNE -- Microsoft's obituary has been written plenty of times. There was no place for the software mammoth in a tech world designed -- and dominated -- by Apple. CEO Steve Ballmer was unable to steer the MORE

    Sep 20, 2011 10:56 AM ET
  • Riding the AAPL Slingshot

    Apple, as hedge fund managers are well aware, is one stock that always bounces back

    Whenever I see a chart like the one at right, which traces the trajectory of Apple's (AAPL) share price over the past 36 days, I'm reminded of Jason Schwarz's "Apple: Seven Reasons Shorts Love It," a supremely cynical view of the stock market that may be the best thing The Street published in all of 2009. MORE

    - Jul 7, 2011 6:58 AM ET
Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.