FORTUNE -- Unless the White House intervenes, five older Apple (AAPL) devices -- including a version of the iPhone 4 that was one of the company's biggest money makers last quarter -- will be seized at the U.S. border starting Monday.
The import ban stems from a June 4 ruling by the U.S. International Trade Commission that has everybody from Microsoft (MSFT) and Intel (INTC) to a bipartisan group of U.S. senators up in arms. Even Verizon (VZ) -- whose iPhones and iPads were not affected -- came out against it in the op-ed pages of the Wall Street Journal.
What made the ITC's ruling so controversial its that it seemed to fly in the face of both U.S. and international law by ignoring a key distinction between two kinds of patents:
The patent in question -- Samsung's U.S. Patent No. 7,706,348 on an "apparatus and method for encoding/decoding transport format combination indicator in CDMA mobile communication system" -- is said to be an essential element of the 3G protocol used in AT&T's (T) versions of the iPhone 4, the iPhone 3GS, the iPad 3G, the iPad 2 3G and the iPad 3.
The ironies are almost too many to list -- starting with a Korean manufacturer successfully preventing a U.S. company from bringing its products into its own country on the strength of an SEP patent when a U.S. district judge refused to ban Samsung devices that were found by a jury to have violated numerous Apple non-SEP patents.
If the White House is serious about its calls for patent reform, this might be a perfect opportunity to show it.
For comprehensive backgrounders on the case, see
by Fortune senior editor Roger Parloff, as well as continuing coverage by FOSS Patent's Florian Mueller, starting here.
Note to editor: Not all patents are the same.
FORTUNE -- Under the headline Samsung-Apple Patent Fight: Is It Worth It?, Wednesday's Wall Street Journal takes a long look at three years of smartphone litigation and concludes that the answer is no.
"A string of rulings in big cases has left litigants with little to show for all the trouble," writes the Journal's Ashby Jones in the "nut" paragraph that states the MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 8, 2013 7:45 AM ET
|America's economic mobility myth|
|Treasury closes the book on GM bailout with final stock sale|
|Where should you put your money now?|
|Snowden docs had NYTimes exec fearing for his life|
|The economy: The 2014 outlook|