FORTUNE -- With the streaming-music business taking heavy fire lately for supposedly underpaying musicians, Spotify has issued research that it says proves that its streaming service reduces piracy.
The report, "Adventures in the Netherlands: Spotify, Piracy, and the new Dutch Experience," indicates that between 2008 and 2012, the percentage of people age 15 or older who downloaded one or more illicit copies of songs fell from 32% to 22%. By the same criteria, downloads of illicit copies of movies (which have no precise analogue to Spotify) rose from 10% to 18%. Spotify launched in the Netherlands in 2010.
The research was conducted by Will Page, Spotify's director of economics. Another finding: Artists who participate on Spotify have their music pirated less often and see increased sales compared to those who don't.
Thom Yorke of Radiohead probably doesn't care: This week, he announced he was yanking all of his non-Radiohead work (solo material and work by his other band, Atoms for Peace) from Spotify in protest of the service's paltry payouts. Interestingly enough, a few days later Yorke announced that he's signed on with another service, the British startup Soundhalo, to stream audio and video of live performances. It's not known what kind of royalties the service pays or how they compare to those paid out by Spotify.
Meanwhile, Internet radio service Pandora (P) is under siege from other musicians and the recording industry for its efforts to put its royalty payments on an equal footing with those of cable and satellite radio, which pay out a lot less.
The fight over whether music streamers like Pandora should pay less in royalties is really a debate over who in the music industry should suffer most.
FORTUNE -- It was recently suggested to me that I examine whether Tim Westergren is suddenly becoming "the new Hilary Rosen." Or in other words, this era's most-hated person in the music business.
In researching the question, I came across a more entertaining comparison: Westergren is MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Jul 18, 2013 6:47 AM ET
A stunning decision in a Microsoft patent infringement case may have made patent royalties more fair, but also made them much more unpredictable.
By Russell L. Parr and George Hovanec , guest contributors
A January decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had a sweeping effect: it dropped the value of US patents. Just how much the value has been reduced, overall, is not yet known. Part of the MOREMar 23, 2011 2:40 PM ET
|Homeless college students seek shelter during breaks|
|Five things you didn't know about Bernie Madoff's epic scam|
|Budget deal hits federal workers|
|Snowden docs had NYTimes exec fearing for his life|
|JPMorgan patents Bitcoin-like payment system|