From the company's point of view, it could have been a lot worse.
The order prohibits Apple from engaging in the kind of negotiations or structuring the kinds of deals that resulted in five of the big six publishers ganging up on Amazon (AMZN) in early 2010 and forcing it to change its e-book business model.
But the judge did not impose some of the more onerous aspects of the Department of Justice's proposed remedies:
A separate jury trial to set penalties -- which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars -- is scheduled for next year.
Judge Cote found in June that Apple had conspired the publishers to fix e-book prices. Apple has said it will appeal that ruling, but has not yet done so.
Link: US v. Apple Injunction.
Meet the only other convicted price-fixer assigned a court-ordered compliance monitor.
FORTUNE -- Once a month starting in 2001, according to the DOJ's complaint, senior sales executives at AU Optronics (ADR) met secretly with their competitors in a Taipei hotel room to set prices for the thin-film transistor LCD screens used in computers and TVs -- a blatant violation of Section 1 of the Sherman antitrust act.
The conspirators called these monthly MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Aug 3, 2013 3:16 PM ET
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|What stumps Warren Buffett? Minimum wage|
|Apple shares soar on increased buyback|
|Facebook profit triples on mobile growth|
|Thanks to Obamacare, more workers may quit their jobs|