By Kevin Kelleher, contributor
FORTUNE -- It's Mark Zuckerberg's knowledge economy now. And the rest of us just share information inside it.
Or at least, that is how it appears to Mark Zuckerberg. Ever since Facebook (FB) blew away its earnings three months ago, the company's CEO has been peppering conference calls with the term. This month, when Facebook again blew past the Street's estimates, he and other executives used the phrase eight times.
The term "knowledge economy" has been around for a couple of decades. In the 1990s, it was one of those infuriatingly vague buzzwords favored by writers and consultants who gave it such a broad definition it ultimately had little meaning. The age of information was dawning, its primary raw material was creative brainpower. But there was little to say beyond that.
In the past decade, academics began taking a harder look at the term. In 2004, Stanford's Walter Powell defined it as "knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to an accelerated pace of technical and scientific advance, as well as rapid obsolescence." But knowledge as capital remained as intangible and hard to measure as ever, and the evidence of its innovations were largely anecdotal.
In appropriating the term to describe Facebook's long-term strategy, Zuckerberg has refined the definition. In a Washington Post op-ed last April, Zuckerberg wrote that "Today's economy ... is based primarily on knowledge and ideas -- resources that are renewable and available to everyone."
With the op-ed, Zuckerberg was announcing FWD.us, a lobbying group advocating for immigration reform and other issues like science research and education. The vision was U.S.-centric, with statements like, "A knowledge economy can scale further, create better jobs and provide a higher quality of living for everyone in our nation."
In a July earnings call, Zuckerberg shifted the scope of his knowledge economy to embrace a global workforce. Now, the knowledge economy involved a "platform to support a larger economic shift in the world based on knowledge and information." The knowledge economy was about creating information-oriented jobs.
In the most recent quarter, after an even more impressive earnings report, Zuckerbeg expanded further on his pet concept. The knowledge economy, he said, "is about helping people create growth in jobs and supporting a larger economic shift in the world based on information and ideas." Now, the term had taken on both idealistic and commercially pragmatic aspects.
Viewed another way, however, the knowledge economy can be boiled down to selling more and better ads.
"The key to building the knowledge economy is building tools for everyone to use information to do their jobs better ... The way businesses will experience this effort is that we will keep building better services for them to reach their customers with higher quality ads, more efficient leads with better targeting, better analytics, and using richer formats. The way people will experience this effort is that the ads they see will become more and more relevant to their lives."
Whether high-minded or not, this new rallying cry matters to Facebook, because it not only shows that the company is in business for the long haul, it also shows how Facebook is scaling up its ambitions. Getting 5 billion people online is a noble way of saying Zuckerberg wants them, and detailed information about them, on Facebook.
None of this is a radical shift from the early days of Facebook, but rather a dramatic expansion of its goals. First, Zuckerberg built Facebook's site into a global social network that attracted 1.2 billion members, with 727 million of them coming back every day. Next, Facebook found a way to monetize their activity by serving ads into their mobile feeds with few complaints and, ideally, with more user engagement.
Now Facebook wants to scale that success up to a massive degree, making ads more relevant to an audience several billion large. This has to be one of the more audacious corporate missions, but it's certainly not the first.
Facebook's knowledge-economy mission is similar to Google's (GOOG) longstanding goal to organize the world's information. The very term echoes Google's Knowledge Graph, a technology aiming to make search more intuitive and informative. None of this is accidental. Both companies want to be the primary means of accessing desired information online, and both are saying so in simply stated but wildly ambitious rhetoric.
Not long ago, the task of handling the ever-expanding ocean of online information was Google's golden ring to grab. Now that Facebook is gaining traction in mobile ads, the company is beginning to reach for it too. And like Google, it's amassing the cash and talent to try and make it happen. Whatever mottoes are involved, a two-horse race that could play out for decades has begun.
The first quantum key distribution network in the United States promises un-hackable data security.
By Clay Dillow
FORTUNE -- As revelations about the depth and breadth of the NSA's digital eavesdropping program continue to come to light, Ohio-based Battelle Memorial Institute is rolling out a new kind of network encryption designed to be virtually un-hackable -- not only now, but in the future. The non-profit research and development contractor has installed MOREOct 14, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The state now requires companies to disclose whether they comply with users' wishes to not have their activities tracked. It probably won't do much.
FORTUNE -- If you were able to tick a box in your browser and stop companies from tracking your online activities, would you do it? You almost certainly would, and that's why Internet companies and privacy groups have been unable to reach an agreement on implementing MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Oct 1, 2013 2:08 PM ET
FORTUNE -- One challenge Facebook (FB) has faced, nearly from day one, is privacy. To what extent are Facebook's 1.2 billion status update-pushing, photo upload-loving members protected?
Google Chairman Eric Schmidt argues that you still know yourself better than his company does.
FORTUNE -- In a recent interview, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt issued the usual defenses of Google's (GOOG) privacy policies: Basically, Google would like to know more about you so that it can target ads at you more effectively and efficiently (oh and "make you more productive" by improving personalized search results), but you don't have to MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Aug 7, 2013 2:08 PM ET
Tapping the strange science of quantum mechanics, physicists are creating new data security protocols that even the NSA can't crack.
By Clay Dillow
FORTUNE -- The news out of Moscow of late has been dominated by Edward Snowden, the American leaker of secret state documents who is currently seeking temporary asylum in Russia. Meanwhile, across town and to much less fanfare, Dr. Nicolas Gisin found himself explaining last week the solution MOREJul 29, 2013 2:45 PM ET
The coalition between civil libertarians on the left and right appears to be stronger than many had thought. But it appears to be an alliance of convenience.
FORTUNE -- The close, bipartisan vote on Wednesday on a House bill to restrict the National Security Agency's program phone surveillance program revealed a radical evolution -- or devolution, depending on how you look at -- in how we approach the always-difficult tension between MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Jul 25, 2013 4:02 PM ET
Kevin Mandia, who uncovered Chinese hacking, describes how he stumbled onto one of the largest domestic security breaches ever.
FORTUNE -- When 42-year-old Kevin Mandia went public last February with a 60-page report detailing the Chinese theft of American trade secrets, the move propelled his cybersecurity firm Mandiant to the forefront of a national security fire storm.
The story of how Mandia discovered one of America's largest security breaches ever -- and MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Jul 24, 2013 7:34 PM ET
In the space of six months Apple received 4,000 to 5,000 law enforcement requests.
FORTUNE -- Embarrassed to find itself on the list of companies from whose servers the National Security Agency claims to have been "directly" collecting data, Apple (AAPL) issued a public statement early Monday that it hoped would allay its customers' concerns. Among the key points:
The authorities asked for a ton of information: Between Dec. 1, 2012 and May MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jun 17, 2013 7:21 AM ET
Companies like Silent Circle, which promises to secure or get rid of consumers' private information, have seen a surge in the wake of government spying reports.
FORTUNE -- Silent Circle, an app that allows users to place encrypted phone calls, makes money on paranoia. Paranoia like, say, the fear that the government might build a massive surveillance operation in cooperation with major tech companies and then keep it secret from the MOREJun 14, 2013 10:24 AM ET
|Homeless college students seek shelter during breaks|
|Another strong quarter for Smith & Wesson|
|Five things you didn't know about Bernie Madoff's epic scam|
|Don't fight it. Bitcoin has a bright future|
|Snowden docs had NYTimes exec fearing for his life|