The plaintiff's original trademark, Android Data, was also canceled.
Imagine Paul Specht's surprise and delight in 2008 when Google (GOOG) announced that it would be calling its new phone operating system "Android" (Google bought Android in 2005, Andy Rubin bought the domain years earlier). Specht previously had a company called "Android Data" a decade ago, which at the time he trademarked with the USPTO. The trademark was granted in 2002.
But 2002 was the tail end of the dot com bubble and Specht's business went under. He tried to sell the company, including the Android Data trademark, but no one would buy it. That is, until Specht (and likely some legal types) heard about Google's Android plans. They sprang into action quickly throwing up an Android Data website to "prove" he was still using his abandoned trademark.
So, as any stereotypically litigation-happy American would, he took Google to court asking for a $94 million in "damages." Maybe Google would just settle, rather than risk losing their Android trademark? They make $94 million in the time it takes to read this post.
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|GM's $1.3 billion recall cost wipes out profit|
|Taxpayers are subsidizing CEO pay - The Buzz|
|Coffee prices skyrocket after Brazil drought - The Buzz|
|Female gun instructors in hot demand|