FORTUNE -- In the summer of 2009 a Danish mobile phone analyst named John Strand issued a 105-page report entitled "The moment of truth: a portrait of the iPhone," that listed the "10 largest myths" about Apple's (AAPL) smartphone:
1) The iPhone drives data traffic into mobile operators networks
2) The iPhone helps operators attract new customers
3) The iPhone is good business for mobile operators
4) The iPhone is dominating the mobile services market
5) App store is a huge success that has revolutionised the services market
6) There is money to be made by developing applications for the iPhone
7) It is iPhone customers that are generating the majority of online mobile surfing traffic
8) The iPhone has a large market share
9) The iPhone was the first mobile phone with a touchscreen
10) The iPhone is a technologically advanced mobile phone
Many of Strand's ideas seem so laughably wrong today that it's hard to believe that they were ever taken seriously. But they were happily picked up by headline writers on both sides of the Atlantic, in part because Strand was always willing to dress up his heresies with eye-catching quotes. In his favorite, repeated at every opportunity, he called the iPhone "the Paris Hilton of mobile phones," as if it were a sexy but empty-headed flash-in-the-pan.
Fast forward to 2012, and Strand's Myth No. 3 -- the (mistaken) idea that carrying the iPhone is good business for mobile operators -- has been making a comeback.
It started in early April, when Walter Piecyk, an analyst at BTIG, downgraded Apple from buy to neutral and told Bloomberg TV "operators are trying to fight back against the impact that Apple is having on their business" -- a reference to the higher subsidies companies like AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ) and Sprint (S) pay Apple for the privilege of carrying the iPhone.
"Okay, This Carrier Subsidy Problem May Be A Real Concern For Apple's Stock" wrote Business Insider's Henry Blodget Tuesday, picking up on a theme explored in the Wall Street Journal the day before.
I don't get it. If the iPhone is so bad for the phone companies, why are they falling over themselves trying to get Apple to let them carry it?
"An iPhone subsidy costs about $400," Dediu replied. "An iPhone customer will spend about $2,400 for service over the life of that phone. Every dollar of subsidy is worth six dollars of revenue. In addition, iPhone customers are more loyal, spend more and tend to stick with the carrier. What's the question again?"
John Strand, by the way, is still around, trash-talking the iPhone at every opportunity. Here he is (below the fold) at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona a few years ago using the Paris Hilton line again and making his oft-repeated claim that in all the years he's been covering the mobile business, he's never made a mistake:
Just in time for this week's Mobile World Congress, a snapshot of where the money goes
To get a sense of what Apple's (AAPL) competitors are up against in Barcelona this week as they unveil their new mobile phone models for the 2012 season, consider the relative size of the solid color profit (and loss) bars in the chart above.
It's the money shot in a series of eye-opening graphs that the inimitable Horace MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 27, 2012 7:24 AM ET
"iPhone makes for worldwide loss" reads the headline in Sunday's Guardian, whose editors apparently missed the flurry of similar pieces that appeared three weeks earlier.
"Telcom operators hurt selling iPhones" was how Reuters handled the story, back on Aug. 17. "Who's screwing who? (sic)" asked Shanzai.com the next day. And from ITWire.com: "iPhone -- The Paris Hilton of mobile phones?"
That last one actually dates from Dec. 5, 2008, when the newsletter MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Sep 7, 2009 8:32 AM ET
|Obama wants to expand overtime pay|
|NJ agrees to ban Tesla direct sales|
|Inside the underground sex economy|
|Mt.Gox CEO's U.S. assets frozen|
|Bitcoin: taxes are the real reason it's doomed|