FORTUNE -- The New Orleans Times-Picayune's decision to return to daily publication, reversing (sort of, in a way) its disastrous move a year ago to print a paper only three days a week, is being described by some observers as a salvo in an escalating newspaper war. The Advocate of Baton Rouge has invested big in covering New Orleans since the Times-Picayune's retreat. That paper is publishing a New Orleans edition, and it has hired a bunch of journalists away from the hometown paper, including some big names.
Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Inquirer has resumed publishing a newsstand edition on Saturdays after halting Saturday publication about two years ago. "This daily newspaper thing may be catching on," wrote David Carr in the New York Times on Sunday. "The much ballyhooed unmaking of daily newspapering seems to be unmaking itself."
Well, not really. Though the moves are certainly positive ones, it's much too early to conclude that daily newspapers are back, or even a quarter of the way back (of course, Carr knows this, as he makes clear). What some publishers seem to be realizing is that, for now at least, the only way to make any money with local and regional news covered by large staffs is by printing newspapers. Online ads sell for a tiny fraction of what print ads generate. Of course, circulation and print-ad sales are generally falling, too, but it's clear that, at the moment, most newspapers need to stick with print until they can figure out how to make money online, if there is a way.
While there are the predictable arguments from digital theoretician types that newspapers should just bag print altogether and go all-digital, they never seem to have a coherent answer for how papers are supposed to make money that way. The arrival of disruptive technology doesn't mean companies must turn on a dime, it means they have to wisely manage the transition into a largely unknowable future. If "legacy" assets are still making money -- even if much less than before -- there is little wisdom in shedding them all at once. There is equally little wisdom in holding on to those assets as their values shrink while ignoring the fact that your industry is under technological assault.
The trick -- and it is no easy one -- is to figure out how quickly to make the transition and how best to adapt to the changing world.
As Carr noted on Sunday, the only way newspapers can succeed is by producing quality journalism. Newspapers, particularly corporate-owned ones, started cutting back on staff well before the industry started to sink about a decade ago, and those cutbacks were indeed part of the reason for the industry's troubles. Reducing newsroom staff led naturally to lower quality, which in turn led to falling circulation and sinking ad rates. The Internet of course is the industry's main problem, but as critics of disinvestment have been saying all along, you can't cut your way to success.
"Newspapers that have cut their operations beyond usefulness or quit delivering a daily print presence have suffered," Carr wrote. "The audience has to be earned every day."
Which is just the opposite of what Advance Publications decided to do with the Times-Picayune a year ago. Carr described what has happened since as "a jaw-dropping blunder to watch." Advance emitted platitudes at the time (swallowed whole by the digital-enthusiast set) about how it was forging ahead into the online future, but it apparently hasn't invested much in either technology or staff. Its website is still terrible, fairly typically for a newspaper, and as the Columbia Journalism Review recently noted, the journalism certainly hasn't improved any, while the Advocate's growing presence and investments in staff seem to be paying off.
A couple of decades ago, newspapers were reliably earning margins of about 30%. Some were up near 50%. Such margins are never going to come back. Warren Buffett, who has been acquiring newspapers, recently said margins of 10% would represent a "decent return." It's possible that newspapers might end up somewhere around there, and thereby survive, but only if they pursue their core public-service function: informing citizens about important issues.
The Times-Picayune's failure to adhere to that mission was put into horrific context on Sunday, the day Carr's column was published. Nineteen people were shot during a second-line parade in New Orleans. Many residents of the city who would have liked to learn about what happened from their hometown newspaper were out of luck. Since many of them can't afford computers or mobile devices, they couldn't see what the Times-Picayune reported about the incident on Monday. Or on Tuesday. The first print edition that came out after the shootings was on Wednesday. For those people, the hometown paper was useless.
The "restored" editions of the paper won't be delivered to homes but available only at newsstands for 75 cents. It will be in a tabloid format and called TPStreet and also available to print subscribers as an "electronic edition." It seems unlikely that this will assuage the city that Advance has essentially abandoned, especially given the presence of a competitor that appears to be taking seriously its mission to cover the city.
Whether this amounts to a "newspaper war" remains to be seen. Carr quoted former Times-Picayune editor Jed Horne as saying it "could end up being two dinosaurs fighting over the last mud hole on an overheated planet."
The only hope for newspapers is that more of them will fall into the hands of owners, like Buffett, who are willing to accept lower profits in return for the opportunity to serve the public interest, which happens to be the only way they can make any money at all.
Lots of grim statistics in a new report for magazines and newspapers from the Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism - with a few rays of hope.
FORTUNE -- The Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism's report, "The State of the News Media 2013" contains plenty of grim news about an industry that appears in some respects to be falling apart at the seams (along with a few rays of hope). But MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Mar 19, 2013 7:19 AM ET
By churning out loads of lowbrow celebrity gossip and the like, HuffPo hopes to be able to draw the traffic necessary to finance more serious content -- just like newspapers do.
FORTUNE -- The Huffington Post, which built its business largely by aggregating and summarizing news stories reported and written by others, on Monday suspended a young technology writer for aggregating and summarizing a story written by someone else. Also on Monday, MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Jul 12, 2011 1:25 PM ET
Live coverage of Apple's Jan. 27 "latest creation" event
Posted in reverse order, newest on top. Items are timestamped in local (Pacific) time. Add three hours for Eastern.
As expected, Apple CEO Steve Jobs made a bid to create a new consumer electronics category Wednesday, unveiling a computer he calls the iPad.
The device is a 9.7-inch multitouch tablet that starts at $499 for the 16 GB model that uses MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 27, 2010 10:00 AM ET
The tech world turns its attention to San Francisco to see what Steve Jobs has up his sleeve
The Yerba Buena Center for the Arts was buzzing Tuesday afternoon with black-shirted Apple staffers hauling in electronics, heavy-set security guys guarding the perimeter, TV satellite trucks jockeying for position and workers on a crane plastering the entrance way with the event's signature paint-spattered logo.
The economy may be sputtering, Bin Laden may be MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 26, 2010 8:12 PM ET
"Secret" talks with publishers appear within hours in the Wall Street Journal
Here's some free advice for Silicon Valley companies visiting New York City: Don't say anything to a newspaper or book publishing executive that you wouldn't want to see on a front page the next day.
Case in point: Details of Apple's (AAPL) eleventh-hour "secret" negotiations with publishers, which Bookseller.com and 9to5 Mac reported on Wednesday morning, turned up Wednesday evening MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 20, 2010 8:31 PM ET
Can media companies thrive online by reaching the right people at the right time?
By Ramana Rao, Co-founder and CEO, iCurrent
Amid the sturm and drang of traditional publishers squaring off against Google (GOOG) and others in a game of high-stakes business, it's easy to lose sight of the opportunity the Internet offers for a much more satisfying news and information experience. Although resolving new models for content MOREDec 15, 2009 9:00 AM ET
Futurist Stewart Brand was the first to say "Information wants to be free." He also said it "wants to be expensive."
By Richard Siklos, editor at large
Rarely a day goes by in media and tech business circles without somebody crying "Information wants to be free!" as a justification for distributing or copying someone else's content -- and as an explanation for why so many traditional information purveyors are in peril.
So I MOREJul 20, 2009 10:00 AM ET
|Make $30 an hour, no bachelor's degree required|
|The 'chicken poop' credit and other bad tax breaks|
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Why Waze is a hot takeover target|
|Where your donation dollars go|