FORTUNE -- What do the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg have in mind for the business-oriented social networks they are each reportedly launching? Probably something less ambitious than "taking on LinkedIn," as several accounts would have it.
Lex Fenwick, the Wall Street Journal's publisher and the CEO of Dow Jones (NWSA), didn't even mention LinkedIn during the recent News Corp. investor presentation where he unveiled the social-media product, WSJ Profile (as first reported by the Times of London). That could be because he doesn't see LinkedIn as a competing product -- and it isn't, really. WSJ Profile seems to be merely a way for readers to set up personal pages on the Journal's website, access Dow Jones's various web offerings (such as Barron's, Dow Jones Newswires, All Things D's tech coverage, and Factiva), their own stock portfolios, and to interact with each other. Seemingly part of a larger strategy to unify Dow Jones's many platforms, it might be a good or a bad idea, but the presence of LinkedIn (or Twitter or Facebook or any other social media product) will have little bearing on whether it succeeds or fails. LinkedIn (LNKD) is mainly a career-focused site aimed at the general public. WSJ Profile seems to be more of a way for Dow Jones to extract more value from its own products.
It's not surprising that the people who are always quick to champion "openness" and to favor social media over professionally produced media (even though the former relies so heavily on the latter) would see this as "the Journal vs. LinkedIn." But by all accounts, Fenwick was fairly clear about the company's intentions: WSJ Profile consolidates all of Dow Jones's services together and syncs brokerage accounts. It's designed to increase subscriber "stickiness" (a term left over from the dot-com boom that simply means keeping people on the site longer) and to better target ads based on readers' interests and behaviors.
Fenwick also mentioned how it helps Journal readers participate in the "sharing economy" (another rather hoary sounding term). That seems like a tertiary consideration, but people who value the Internet's ability to facilitate online yammering over its ability to disseminate valuable information are, unsurprisingly, more focused on the yammering part.
It's a little harder to tell what Bloomberg has in mind for Bloomberg Current, now in beta and with only a bare-bones sign-up page, but judging by this page created by its designers, it seems to be something similar: People set up pages for themselves with custom-designed news feeds and the ability to communicate with other users.
Again, this is being described as an also-ran competitor to LinkedIn and Twitter. Mathew Ingram of paidContent went so far as to say that "Bloomberg's core business is clearly threatened" by those two social networks, and he described Bloomberg Current as a desperate response to that threat. "Although the wire service has made the bulk of its multibillion-dollar revenues from selling its proprietary terminals," he wrote, "one crucial factor in the value of those terminals is the way they allow traders, brokers, and other financial professionals to connect with each other, send instant messages and so on. Real-time market data is also important, obviously, but those connections are gold."
Well, no, the gold is in the data, and in the ability to manipulate and analyze it, as well as to execute trades (also, the wire service is really just an adjunct to Bloomberg's main business: its proprietary data service). For Bloomberg customers, data is much more than "also important" -- it's basically the whole thing. Few companies are going to shell out $1,500 a month per user just so employees have the ability to "connect" with people. Email, instant messaging, and message boards have been ubiquitous for nearly two decades, and they're all free. The Bloomberg terminal's facilitation of "connectedness" is just one, relatively minor feature of the product. Bloomberg Current, like WSJ Profile, seems like a way to appeal to everyday consumers of business news, whether they have a Bloomberg box or not. This shares some, but not all, of LinkedIn's features, and even fewer of Twitter's. It could turn out that the "closedness" of the service will appeal to people who might want to engage with others about business news but are turned off by the awful and annoying behavior that often comes with more "open" social networks like Twitter.
One aim of both of these products might be simply to enable salespeople to use the phrase "social media" when they're meeting with clients and potential clients. Whether the products will do much for either the Journal or Bloomberg is highly uncertain. Previous attempts by media companies to create their own, social-media-like services haven't done so well. The best-known of them, the New York Times' TimesPeople, was launched in 2008 and was killed three years later. But that was a very different endeavor from what the Journal and Bloomberg seem to have in mind. TimesPeople was more akin to social media networks as we know them, with an emphasis on general news. It enabled people to follow each other, comment on stories, and share their favorite items from across all of the Times' sections, from sports to international news to reviews of Broadway shows. Bloomberg and the Journal are much more tightly focused on actionable business news.
One other thing the Journal's effort should not be compared to: MySpace. News Corp. which owns Dow Jones and the Journal, purchased MySpace and mismanaged nearly all the value out of it before selling it off. But MySpace was a separate entity from all the rest of News Corp.'s products, and it was largely aimed at kids and young adults. It makes no sense to compare MySpace to WSJ Profile just because they're both vaguely involved with "social media" in some way. But that hasn't stopped people from making the connection anyway.
On the New York Times Op-Ed page he calls Apple CEO Tim Cook a liar.
FORTUNE -- I met Joe Nocera once, and he seemed like a nice guy. Over his long career as a business journalist -- including more than a decade at Fortune -- he's done some first-rate work on Apple (AAPL). "The Second Coming of Steve Jobs," a profile for Esquire of the entrepreneur at age 31, may MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 23, 2013 7:24 AM ET
Next week we'll find out what a Senate probe of Apple's taxes has uncovered.
FORTUNE -- According to the New York Times' Pulitzer Prize-winning iEconomy series, Apple (AAPL) has gone to extraordinary lengths to avoid paying its fair share of taxes -- well beyond the usual tax reduction strategies U.S. corporations have long considered fair game.
"Apple was a pioneer of an accounting technique known as the 'Double Irish With a Dutch MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 16, 2013 9:07 AM ET
Once again, the paper twists itself into a pretzel to find the Apple-is-doomed angle.
FORTUNE -- Readers who remember the New York Times' 2012 investigation of conditions in the Chinese factories that build iPads and iPhones for Apple (AAPL) -- the article that described Apple as "reprehensible" and "morally repugnant" -- may be surprised if they open Tuesday's business section and read this lead paragraph:
"Terry Gou did almost everything that Apple could ask MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 7, 2013 7:45 AM ET
Attacked in the a.m. for not stopping cellphone theft and in the p.m. for not paying taxes.
FORTUNE -- Honorable men and women can disagree about whether a front page story in Thursday's New York Times, blamed Apple (AAPL) for the epidemic of cellphone thefts or merely accused the company of not doing all it could.
But there's no getting around the fatal problem with the sentence in Floyd Norris' Apple's Shuffle MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 2, 2013 5:53 PM ET
"This is a crime that could be easily fixed with a technological solution," quoth a D.A.
FORTUNE -- Slipping back into a lazy editorial stance that it rode last year all the way to a Pulitzer Prize, the New York Times has crafted a front page story about the growing problem of cellphone thefts that manages to shift the blame from the thieves who steal them to the carriers that subsidize them and MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 2, 2013 6:47 AM ET
The paper wins journalism's top prize for zeroing in on high tech's fattest target.
FORTUNE -- I hate to say I told you so, but I predicted back in January 2012 when the New York Times followed since disgraced monologist Mike Daisey's lead and sent a team of reporters to write about the working conditions in Chinese iPad factories, that the paper was going for a Pulitzer.
It didn't matter that every MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Apr 16, 2013 6:33 AM ET
The paper's controversial "iEconomy" series went home empty handed Monday
FORTUNE -- With a record 108 Pulitzers under its belt, no American newspaper is better at winning journalism awards than the New York Times. And by the publication of the second in what was to be a nine-part series on the "iEconomy"-- seven of which were focused on Apple (AAPL) -- we were pretty sure the editors were hoping to ride Steve MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 18, 2013 3:31 PM ET
Part 9 in its iEconomy series, published Thursday, is the hammer that tries to nail it
FORTUNE -- If you wondered where the New York Times' massive, 9-part iEconomy series was headed, here's a clue: Part 1 was published on Jan. 21, and Part 9 on Thursday, Dec. 27 -- just under the wire, we presume, for the Dec. 25 electronic submission deadline for the 2012 Pulitzer Prizes in Journalism.
For reporters who know MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Dec 27, 2012 4:50 PM ET
Is that really why Apple has become, per Politico, a "punching bag" for lawmakers?
FORTUNE -- I might feel differently about Apple's D.C. Lobbying Effort Has Yet to Ripen, the 1,450-word piece posted on Politico Wednesday, if I hadn't just listened to Take the Money and Run for Office, This America Life's brilliant hour-long expose of how Washington, D.C., influence peddling really works.
By the end of the radio piece (available as a podcast), MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 10, 2012 7:01 AM ET
|Stocks: Investors hold their breath for Bernanke|
|Chrysler relents, agrees to recall 2.7 million Jeeps|
|Fed not expected to taper QE3 until December|
|China's fastest-growing cities for millionaires|
|U.S. oil boom helps thwart OPEC|