New York Post

Charlie Gasparino on Apple and high-frequency trading

April 8, 2014: 5:16 AM ET

Fox Business News' senior correspondent, say Apple investors, couldn't be more wrong.

Fox's Gasparino

Fox's Gasparino

FORTUNE -- After watching Apple's (AAPL) share price get whipsawed for years by market behavior seemingly disconnected from the company's underlying value, you could almost hear the jaws drop on Investor Village AAPL Sanity Board last week when Charlie Gasparino used the New York Post's op-ed page to come to the defense of high-frequency trading.

In a piece titled "Michael Lewis' high-frequency bull," Fox Business News' combative senior correspondent slammed Lewis' new book Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt as "utterly disingenuous" and an "easy lefty" take on advances in computer technology that Gasparino maintains have made the markets more efficient and lowered the cost of trading. If there is any "ripoff," he writes, it "is of the rich, by the rich."

"The guy who buys Apple on an online-brokerage account gets the price he sees on his screen; that's how the E*trades of the world fill orders. And if you have a mutual fund, your money manager should be smart enough to figure out (as many have) how not to be gamed by the HFT guys."

"That's like saying one tree isn't affected by a forest fire," wrote a Sanity member who posts under the initials djt.

Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 10.44.03 AM"Charlie don't trade," wrote another. "If he did, he would notice all sorts of weirdness around bids and asks and executions of trades... The effect may be de minimis on any given 100 share trade where they shave a subpenny, but I can't tell you how many times I tried to hit a bid to sell, or hit an ask to buy, and they turned out to be a mirage. The market isn't broken, it's 'fixed.'"

"Big money is in a full court press defense at the moment trying to diminish the impact of Lewis's expose," wrote still another. "[Gasparino] suggests that the small retail investor is in no way being impacted while the HFTs skim fractions of a cent off per trade. While that may even be true on a per trade level, it ignores the overall impact of a crooked system. It also ignores the potential for manipulation and flash crashes created when 99% of orders are withdrawn milliseconds after placement. And it glosses over the fact that perhaps the 'watchdogs' are as much to blame as the traders because after they put in their time at SEC boot camp, they want a place at the trough working for an HFT."

"Sometimes folks," djt concludes., "things are exactly as they appear to be. In this case, rigged."

LINKS:

Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.