FORTUNE -- Samsung's failure to produce evidence in a timely manner is emerging as a pivotal issue in the California federal court where Apple (AAPL) has sued the Korean smartphone manufacturer for allegedly infringing Apple's iPhone patents.
Last week, FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller reported that the judge in the case had ordered harsh "preclusive sanctions" against Samsung for what Mueller described as "a particularly inexcusable violation" of a court order to deliver source code.
As Mueller noted, "This is not the first time that Samsung is found guilty of non-compliance with a discovery order."
Now NetworkWorld's Yoni Heisler has taken a deeper look at Samsung's record of non-compliance. As he reported Friday:
"I pored over Apple's motion along with Samsung's subsequent motion in opposition and suffice it to say, Samsung likes to play fast and loose with its legal obligations. Specifically, Samsung has a policy whereby custodian emails are automatically deleted every two weeks, even in instances where the company is required by law to preserve any and all emails that might reasonably be pertinent to a foreseeable or ongoing lawsuit."
In its motion, Apple accused Samsung of destroying "vast quantities of relevant evidence in blatant disregard of its duty to preserve all such evidence," something it charges Samsung did in a similar case before the International Trade Commission.
It also cited other instances of wholesale document destruction:
Apple has asked the judge to instruct the jury:
1. Samsung had a duty to preserve relevant evidence, failed to do so, and acted in bad faith in failing to meet its legal duty.
2. The jury may infer that documents Samsung failed to produce would have been advantageous to Apple's position.
3. If the jury finds Samsung liable for infringement, they may presume that the infringement was "intentional, willful, without regard to Apple's rights."
The case is scheduled to go to trial on July 30.
He wasn't particularly fond of the name, recalls co-founder Dag Kittlaus
Three weeks after his Siri app was approved for sale on the App Store, Dag Kittlaus was told to expect a call from Apple senior vice president Scott Forstall. The phone rang:
"Dag, this is Steve Jobs."
That, according to NetworkWorld's Yoni Heisler, was the beginning of the chain of events that led to Apple (AAPL) buying Kittlaus' company for $200 million and making MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 28, 2012 12:25 PM ET
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|What stumps Warren Buffett? Minimum wage|
|Apple shares soar on increased buyback|
|Facebook profit triples on mobile growth|
|Thanks to Obamacare, more workers may quit their jobs|