By Catherine Tucker
FORTUNE -- A lot of attention has been paid lately to big tech companies buying up smaller firms in billion-dollar deals: In January, Google acquired Nest for $3.2 billion, Facebook purchased mobile message service, WhatsApp, the following month for $19 billion; last week, it acquired virtual reality gaming company, Oculus VR, for $2 billion. There is a lot of discussion about the motives behind these large deals. Some say they are attempts to block competition, while others maintain they are efforts to stay relevant.
I see these deals as a reflection of the uncertainty companies face as they try to identify the next big thing. This is especially true for successful companies like Facebook (FB) and Google (GOOG), which are known for doing what they do tremendously well. They've seen similarly successful companies like Kodak struggle as technology moves on, rendering its product obsolete. As a result, companies today are eternally motivated to look outside their current business.
Viewed in this light, an acquisition strategy makes a lot of sense. Google is a good example. It excels so much in the search space that this very expertise makes it hard to divert its attention to other things that are not search.
We tend to see this strategy more in the tech space than in life sciences or other areas. This is because the destruction of business models is so much more rapid (and in some ways vicious) in technology. In other spaces, you have at least a few years to see the changes ahead. Even Kodak had a good 10 years after digital cameras were invented to sell film before it became irrelevant. However, you only reap first-mover rewards for a short period in technology. Look at the relatively brief popularity of Myspace.com as an example. I'm sure that this is something that haunts everyone at Facebook.
Successful tech companies like Google and Facebook know they have to hedge their bets. They have to assume their current product or services will be replaced. And they know that their own imagination may be hampered by the fact that they are so good at what they currently do. They may not be able to envision what the future holds without looking to outside companies. This is why we so often see these large tech companies acquiring smaller ones in adjacent spaces. They are trying to disrupt their current business model rather than acquire something that immediately fits into the current line of business.
So while tech companies are certainly competitive, that's not what's driving these acquisitions. Instead, it's all about the continuing search for the next big thing.
Catherine Tucker is a marketing professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
TechStars has made a habit of partnering with corporations for vertical-specific accelerators. Today, its first one focused on hardware debuts in New York.
FORTUNE – Venture investors have a worn-out saying for hardware startups: There's a reason they call it hardware. It's hard.
For the past few decades, they've mostly heeded that saying and avoided investing in the category. Software has produced big wins for venture capital, and they've stuck with what MOREErin Griffith - Mar 18, 2014 3:58 PM ET
In exclusive interview with Fortune, VP of corporate development Don Harrison discusses Larry Page's plan to expand into new areas through M&A.
FORTUNE -- Don Harrison became Google's head of mergers and acquisitions about a year ago. But he's been helping Google (GOOG) buy companies since 2001, when the company snapped up the Internet newsgroups archive Deja News, its first acquisition ever.
Harrison, then a lawyer at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, MOREMiguel Helft, senior writer - Feb 12, 2014 10:46 AM ET
Its acquisition of DeepMind Technologies holds promise for its advertising, autonomous vehicle, and "smart home" businesses.
By Verne Kopytoff
FORTUNE -- Google's executives have long dreamed of solving one of the technology industry's biggest riddles. How do you predict what people want -- hockey scores or new Ugg boots, for example -- before they even ask for it? Reading user's minds, or at least seeming to, would make Google's products that MOREFeb 5, 2014 6:41 AM ET
Early on, the IDEO veteran saw the potential in a "green" company that understood consumers.
FORTUNE -- Among the happiest of the investors behind Google's (GOOG) move to buy Nest Labs for $3.2 billion earlier this week is the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which is believed to be the company's largest outside shareholder. The deal will likely return the firm 20 times its original investment, a win for MOREJessi Hempel, writer - Jan 16, 2014 3:22 PM ET
"Quality is not a fad, neither is sustainability," says the co-founder and CEO of Nest.
FORTUNE -- Tony Fadell is the co-founder and CEO of Nest, a household product manufacturer that focuses on social and environmental sustainability. Prior to founding Nest he worked as the senior vice president of the iPod division and as advisor to the CEO for Apple. Nest creates "smart" household products like the programmable Nest thermostat and the MOREChanelle Bessette - Nov 13, 2013 11:29 AM ET
He may not have the celebrity of Jony Ive, but when it comes to design, the tech world knows to seek out Fred Bould.
FORTUNE -- Fred Bould is far from a household name, but his small industrial design firm is behind some of the hottest gadgets currently on the market. You'd never guess it by visiting Bould Design's offices -- the small team works out of a nondescript building right MOREMichal Lev-Ram, writer - Oct 30, 2013 1:12 PM ET
Ex-Apple SVP Tony Fadell first wowed consumers in 2011 by introducing a sleek thermostat. Now he's back, this time with an equally elegant smoke detector called Nest Protect.JP Mangalindan, Writer - Oct 8, 2013 9:00 AM ET
|5 people you might not tip (but should)|
|Toyota unveils redesigned Camry|
|Oklahoma bans local minimum wage increases|
|Stock gain after Janet Yellen speech|
|GM reveals most powerful drop-top Corvette|