FORTUNE -- John Thompson, a veteran software executive and a board member at Microsoft since 2012, led the committee that chose company insider Satya Nadella to replace Steve Ballmer as CEO. In an interview for the current issue of Fortune about Virtual Instruments, where Thompson is CEO, he also spoke about the importance of culture, similarities between Microsoft today and IBM 25 years ago, and the unusually public nature of the CEO search.
Fortune: How important is corporate culture, reflecting on your tenure at IBM?
Thompson: There are two important issues that every leader in every company grapples with. First, as the company grows, do the management systems of how you think about markets, think about deployment of resources, think about allocation of capital all change to accommodate a bigger and different company? And does the culture along the way change as well?
I think one of the things IBM learned was when their monopoly ran out and they had to compete with a bunch of smaller, more agile companies, they needed to have a different rate and pace of change. And Lou Gerstner coming into IBM certainly brought about a sense of urgency that some would argue the company didn't really have at that time. And clearly the monopoly was gone, and clearly the market was loaded with a host of new competitors in almost every segment they were in. It required a leader who was willing to say, "Here's what we're going to do, and here's what we're not going to do. And here are the behaviors that will be rewarded, and here are the ones that will be punished." Over time, that changed IBM's culture.
You don't change a company's culture overnight. It's more about the subtle influences and the consistency and predictability of those influences that over time drives that subtle behavior change that we call culture.
Does Microsoft's culture need to change?
I think that's a better question for Satya. But I would argue that there are some attributes to Microsoft today that do look vaguely like IBM circa 1990. The Windows monopoly is in fact under attack, and therefore we're going to have to change or think differently about the management systems and the associated culture of the company as time goes on.
What do you make of the high-profile situation the Microsoft CEO search became?
First off, it's one of the largest and most respected companies in the world. And the fact that we chose to do a very public external search was as much for our investors as it was for anyone else to make sure that we had done the best possible job we could of surveying the landscape and picking the leader that we thought would do the most to create real value for shareholders over the long term. And you can't take a company that's a leader in an industry, recognized globally, one of the largest market cap companies in the world, and do something like that in a vacuum or in a test tube. It's got to be done publicly.
Candidly, I would have to say a very large percentage of the stuff that got written was just stuff. It wasn't necessarily grounded in truth. But if you could pick up a little germ here and a little germ there and you could string them together, you could write a story. And there were a lot of stories written that just weren't true. There were people who purported to have been interviewed for the job or who turned the job down that just wasn't true.
And so as it went on, it became more interesting than anything else. As stories evolved or emerged or ebbed and flowed I never really expected to have -- for it to have the public profile that it did -- and I certainly never myself expected to have the public profile that I did. I did one Wall Street Journal interview at the request of Microsoft, and that's it. And we did the blog post in December. That's it. Those are the only two public things I did.
But somehow the world got this view that I was bigger than life. I was doing my job just like the other directors who were a part of the committee. Yes, I was the chairman of the committee, but the characterization of me as this, you know, person who had this flame being fanned to create this pervasive view of who I was and what I was doing and all that, that's just not true.
The Wall Street Journal interview was done at the bequest of Microsoft because they were doing a profile on Steve Ballmer. I'll just leave it at that. And in the blog post was we had all hoped -- many of our investors had hoped -- that we would be done by year-end 2013. And when it became apparent to us that we weren't going to achieve that, we felt that the easiest way to communicate with everyone that it was going to be a 2014 transaction was to put this blog post out. Well, all of a sudden it's like, "There's Thompson again in the press." Well, hell. So people made more of it than I thought, quite frankly.
More Microsoft on Fortune.com:
The transfer of power from founders to a new generation is always fraught with peril
by Geoff Colvin
FORTUNE—Now that Microsoft (MSFT) has finally put a stop to six months of media chatter by naming a new CEO, Satya Nadella, it's easy to miss the profundity of what is still going on there. In ending one process, the company has just begun a far larger and more important one: transferring top-level guidance MOREFeb 10, 2014 11:46 AM ET
Microsoft's new chairman brings focus and an even keel to its board of directors.
By Verne Kopytoff
FORTUNE -- When John Thompson resigned as Symantec's chief executive in 2009, he figured he'd do like many other retired Silicon Valley leaders: invest in start-ups and sit on a few corporate boards. In short, he wanted a bit of tranquility after years of hard work.
Retirement has been anything but tranquil for Thompson, however. MOREFeb 7, 2014 4:00 PM ET
Before Microsoft selected him as its third-ever chief executive, Satya Nadella showed traits that would catapult him into the company's leading role.
FORTUNE -- The first thing a visitor from Silicon Valley notices in Building 35 on the Microsoft campus in Redmond, Wash. -- until today the domain of new CEO Satya Nadella -- is the silence. This is the stodgy, old Microsoft (MSFT), a warren of offices with doors that MOREAdam Lashinsky, Sr. Editor at Large - Feb 4, 2014 3:09 PM ET
Steve Ballmer will step down as chief executive immediately, and Bill Gates will vacate his position as chairman of the technology giant's board.
FORTUNE -- Microsoft (MSFT) on Tuesday named Satya Nadella as its next chief executive officer, ending an extended search for a new leader. He's only the third CEO in the technology company's 39-year history, and previously served as executive vice president of Microsoft's Cloud and Enterprise group.
Steve Ballmer, who announced MOREAndrew Nusca - Feb 4, 2014 9:30 AM ET
The software giant soon will name a new leader after a tumultuous seven months of drama. A look back at the upheaval Microsoft's next CEO must address.
By Geoff Colvin and Adam Lashinsky, senior editors-at-large
FORTUNE -- Bill Gates was the star attraction at a private event that included some of Silicon Valley's young luminaries in San Francisco last October, but his planned topic, philanthropy, wasn't the most prominent topic on their MOREFeb 3, 2014 7:00 AM ET
As the world prepares for Microsoft to announce a new chief executive, we ask the company's top executives -- including the man himself -- to take a look at the legacy Steve Ballmer leaves on the technology company.
By Mary Jo Foley, special to Fortune
FORTUNE -- On the eve of his exit as chief executive officer of Microsoft, after more than a decade on the job, Steve Ballmer is more than MOREDec 11, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The outgoing CEO admits that Microsoft is still in the "early days" of a turnaround.
FORTUNE -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer isn't done saying goodbye just yet. After a heartfelt speech to employees late last month, on Monday Ballmer published his final letter to shareholders, taking the opportunity to extoll the company's ongoing "transformation" into a devices and services provider and highlight its key milestones over the last year.
"We brought Windows MOREMichal Lev-Ram, writer - Oct 8, 2013 9:55 AM ET
The former IBM chief has a stellar record. What better credentials could a new Microsoft CEO have than having humiliated and beaten his new charges?
FORTUNE -- When I reviewed Steve Ballmer's umpteenth structural reorganization of Microsoft last month -- was it only last month? -- I noted that the key missing ingredient to making the construct work was leadership. A re-jiggered Apple without Steve Jobs doing the jiggering never would MOREAdam Lashinsky, Sr. Editor at Large - Aug 27, 2013 10:13 AM ET
It's taken a couple of days for the import of Ballmer's retirement to sink in.
FORTUNE -- For a time in the mid 1980s, Steve Ballmer used to stop by my cubby hole at Time Magazine on his visits to New York. I was a struggling staff writer and he was Bill Gates' oversized salesman, but he didn't impress me as a man with a vision or deep knowledge of computers, MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Aug 25, 2013 5:52 AM ET
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|Coffee prices skyrocket after Brazil drought - The Buzz|
|GM's $1.3 billion recall cost wipes out profit|
|Taxpayers are subsidizing CEO pay - The Buzz|
|Female gun instructors in hot demand|