FORTUNE -- Foot traffic at bookstores rose by 27% in the first quarter of this year, according to a report issued this week by Placed, a Seattle-based company that aims to bring Internet-like marketing analytics to the offline world.
That seems like a surprising number. It's hard to know for sure how accurate it is, or how effectively such reports might sell companies on Placed's services, though they do help the company get media attention. It's a bit ironic, though, because the analytics Placed offers its customers are a lot more sophisticated than clunky foot-traffic counts. For its new Placed Insights service, the company automatically collects data from people who have downloaded its smartphone app, so the population that it studies is self-selected, despite protestations to the contrary by CEO and founder David Shim. It's not nearly as accurate as simply counting heads, as stores already do.
Nevertheless, the technology is both fascinating and promising -- maybe even revolutionary. While big retailers and chain restaurants have developed sophisticated methods for measuring foot traffic within their stores, Placed also reports what customers do before they get there and after they leave. Further, it breaks down their demographic profiles and presents retailers and restaurant chains with the kinds of analytics that companies like Nielsen (NSLN) and comScore (SCOR) provide to online marketers.
A marketer, Shim says, might want to know: "Where do McDonald's (MCD) customers go to eat when they're not at McDonald's?" If they tend to go to Panda Express or Burger King (BKW) rather than, say, Applebee's, that's a useful data point. (Placed doesn't reveal the names of its customers, but Shim says they tend to be large retailers, chain restaurants, and ad agencies.) It's even more useful to know the demographics of various customers: say, whether older, Hispanic customers of McDonald's, as opposed to other groups, tend to prefer Panda Express over Applebee's.
The ability to gather and manipulate this kind of data is unprecedented -- in some ways, it's even more useful and revealing than the data that can be gathered by tracking people's online behaviors. Other companies provide somewhat similar services, but they gather their data (such as shopping habits) from third parties and cover wider geographical areas. Placed Insights gets it right from the source: the consumer, and the geography is measured almost down to the square foot. Placed Insights incorporates about 13 billion latitudinal/longitudinal geographical points and combines them with billions of other bits of data to produce any number of possible insights. This marriage of mobile technology and big data could revolutionize how marketers reach customers who are away from their computers, and shopping or dining.
Placed Insights uses GPS, Wi-Fi networks, cellular triangulation, and accelerometer and gyroscope technologies to determine not only whether a person has arrived at a destination, but whether they went inside, and even their movements in buildings.
If all this sounds a bit Big Brotherish, it's helpful to remember that all of the 70,000 people (at the moment) under Placed's microscope have opted in to the service (in return for various incentives, such as small rewards or having money donated to charity). And Shim says that none of the data is attached to any user's name when it is turned over to his customers. The company promises that users of its app will not be personally targeted with ads: The data is used only in aggregate form, for analytical purposes. The data is "normalized" using other data such as census reports. If a white app user happens to live in a mostly black neighborhood, for example, that data point is factored in -- or out.
Not all that many people are interested in downloading Placed's own app just to provide data for marketing purposes, so Placed strikes deals with app developers to put the functionality into other apps -- often travel-oriented ones. Again, it's all opt-in. Developers can actually make some decent coin from this: Shim says they get "a few hundred to a few thousand dollars a month," which is particularly attractive since most of the apps in question are free.
While the group is self-selected (the app doesn't really measure what the population at large does -- it measures what smartphone users who have chosen to take part do), Shim says it is nevertheless as accurate as such a thing can possibly be. "People opt in to Nielsen ratings, too," he points out.
Abercrombie brands itself as "exclusionary." And that means trouble.
FORTUNE -- A video depicting a hipster giving homeless people clothes from Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) reached critical viral mass this week. It was a protest against Abercrombie's practice of only hiring "good-looking" people for its stores, not stocking women's clothes in large sizes, and marketing itself only to "cool kids."
"Abercrombie & Fitch is a terrible company," says filmmaker Greg Karber. Which MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - May 16, 2013 1:48 PM ET
A $45 million lawsuit suggests that Samsung also spends a fortune on refrigerator ads.
FORTUNE -- We've learned a couple of things since November when Asymco's Horace Dediu surprised us with his estimate that Samsung spends more on marketing than Apple (AAPL), HP (HPQ), Dell (DELL) Microsoft (MSFT) and Coca Cola (KO) combined.
1. We learned that Dediu's estimate was a few billion dollars short. According to the update he posted Tuesday MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Apr 4, 2013 8:32 AM ET
Bottom line: Apple's webpage beats Samsung's. Samsung's video beats Apple's ads
FORTUNE -- In case you missed it, the smartphone wars entered a new phase last week with the introduction of the latest Samsung phone to challenge Apple's (AAPL) iPhone line.
Samsung's Galaxy S4 may not be available for sale for another five or six weeks, but that hasn't stopped Samsung from pouring millions into a promotional campaign or Apple from launching MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 17, 2013 8:37 AM ET
It's bigger than than Apple, HP, Dell, Microsoft and Coca Cola's combined
FORTUNE -- One of the reasons Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets seem to be everywhere these days may be that the company is spending a fortune -- nearly $12 billion a year, according to Asymco's Horace Dediu -- on advertising, commissions and sales promotions.
Dediu estimates that Samsung now spends more on marketing its mobile devices than Apple (AAPL), HP MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Nov 29, 2012 1:56 PM ET
No tax, no shipping charge. The catch: Walmart wants your e-mail and home address
FORTUNE -- If you buy a lot of iPhone apps or iTunes music, Apple (AAPL) gift certificates are almost as good as cash.
Indeed, there's a lively trade in iTunes gift cards on eBay (EBAY), where a $100 certificate will fetch anywhere from $82 to $109.99 on a Buy It Now basis.
Now, as The Verge notes in its MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Aug 20, 2012 7:20 AM ET
The Galaxy Nexus "Calling all pretty faces" is an homage to Apple in more ways than one
Android marketing has come a long way from the 2009 TV ad for Motorola's Droid that asked:
"Should a phone be pretty?"
Judging from the spot that debuted Thursday for the Galaxy Nexus -- the new Android smartphone manufactured by Samsung for Google -- Google's (GOOG) answer in 2011 is an emphatic "yes!"
The ad -- like MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Nov 20, 2011 7:05 AM ET
A new sleep-tracking app for the iPhone from Lark offers a peek into life inside a retailing partnership with Apple.
FORTUNE -- Julia Hu got into bed with Apple (AAPL) so she could sell gadgets that get people out of bed. Hu is the CEO of Lark, a startup making a wristband that tracks your sleep until the moment it interrupts it. That's when it starts vibrating, a silent alarm that MOREChadwick Matlin - Jul 6, 2011 1:11 PM ET
Valued at more than $153 billion, it overtook Google on the strength of the iPhone and iPad
For the first time since BrandZ began compiling its annual ranking of the world's most valuable brands, Apple (AAPL) topped the list with an 84% surge that put its value at more than $153 billion, comfortably ahead of Google (GOOG), which had held the top spot since 2007.
According to Millward Brown, the subsidiary of MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 9, 2011 7:07 AM ET
Fans! Likes! Followers! The social site was supposed to be the Holy Grail for corporate marketers, but the search for that mythic chalice may still be on.
By Kit R. Roane, contributor
FORTUNE -- The advertising firm Interpublic Group invested $5 million in Facebook five years ago and now has roughly $250 million to show for it, at least on paper. The question is whether Interpublic's clients, or the rest of the MOREApr 6, 2011 9:50 AM ET
|Bernanke and China send world stocks lower|
|China factory activity hits 9-month low|
|J.D. Power ranks GM tops in quality for first time|
|Much faster Wi-Fi coming soon|
|Dow sinks 200 points after Fed hints at stimulus easing|