FORTUNE -- His dissent was heavily redacted and buried in a long official filing. But everything you need to know about how the U.S. International Trade Commission punted when it granted Samsung's request for an import ban on five Apple's (AAPL) devices -- forcing the first Presidential veto of one of its decisions in a quarter century -- is contained in the opinion filed by Dean Pinkert, one of the ITC's six commissioners.
Pinkert, a George W. Bush appointee (and a Democrat), laid out in careful detail why his fellow commissioners were wrong to order Apple to cease and desist selling those five products -- including a version of the iPhone 4 that is still one of the company's most popular -- on the strength of Samsung's complaint.
Among the reasons he cites:
Reading between the lines, it sounds like Samsung had refused to license its standard-essential patents (SEPs) unless Apple offered its non-essential iPhone patents -- the company's crown jewels -- in return.
As usual, FOSS Patent's Florian Mueller was on top of the case. In early July he obtained a copy of Pinkert's dissent, painstakingly transcribed it into HTML, and published it in a post that began:
"I'm outraged. The underlying rationale of the ITC ruling is a serious threat to innovation and competition. Among other things, it represents a radical departure from well-established antitrust principles concerning the illegal practice of tying (in this case, a Samsung proposal that required Apple to license its non-standard-essential patents to Samsung in order to get an SEP license). This totally runs counter to the ITC's mission to protect the domestic industry."
The Obama Administration agreed. On Saturday it threw out the ITC's verdict and told Samsung that if it wanted to pursue the case, it could take Apple to court.
UPDATE: Reader Jim Neal points out that the other five members of the ITC are no dummies. He suggests that they may have secretly supported Pinkert's dissent, and that they deliberately kicked the case upstairs to the President, hoping that the import ban they reluctantly ordered would get vetoed.
"The Obama administration has made it clear in recent weeks," Neal writes, "that the system is in dire need of revision, that companies are unfairly using SEP to extort money, to obtain unfair patent licensing agreements from other companies, even to flat out kill competition. Changes to the ITC mandate might well be in the offing, but for now the ITC majority did exactly what the administration wanted -- made the only decision that would allow a higher authority to send a stronger message than they ever could."
Below the fold: Pinkert's dissent, as transcribed by Mueller.
The Obama Administration vetoes an import ban that never made much sense.
FORTUNE -- It was hailed by the Wall Street Journal as a "huge legal victory" for Samsung and blasted by pretty much anyone with a stake in the equitable application of U.S. patent law, from Microsoft (MSFT) to a bipartisan group of U.S. senators.
But at the last minute -- on the final day of a 60-day review period -- the Obama Administration MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Aug 3, 2013 4:59 PM ET
Wouldn't it have been easier for Apple to replace her out-of-warranty iPhone 4?
FORTUNE -- This is a classic.
Woman buys an iPhone 4. Fifteen months later the power button stops working. She calls AT&T (T). They send her to Apple (AAPL). She works her way up and down the customer service chain and gets tough love at every turn: Her warranty expired three months ago. She has two choices. Pay for MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 15, 2013 8:06 AM ET
The social network is testing out ways to give children safe and legal access; why the TV business may be on the verge of collapse.
Facebook explores giving kids access [THE WALL STREET JOURNAL]
Facebook is developing technology that would allow children younger than 13 years old to use the social-networking site under parental supervision, a step that could help the company tap a new pool of users for revenue but also inflame MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Jun 4, 2012 1:04 PM ET
A blogger uncovers the $2 billion dispute behind Friday's bizarre back and forth
Apple (AAPL) watchers were shocked Friday when the company, in response to a court-ordered injunction, removed the iPhone 4 and 3GS from its online Apple Store in Germany.
The injunction was suspended before the end of the day -- and the products restored -- but the bizarre incident left analysts and investors wondering what the hell was going on.
FOSS MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 4, 2012 11:25 AM ET
Apple forced to pull older iPhones off its online store, faces an injunction on push e-mail
UPDATE: Sales of Apple's iPhones resumed Friday. See here.
- - -
It was a crazy day for Apple (AAPL) in Germany.
First it removed the iPhone 4 and 3GS from its German online store -- the first time, as far as we know, that the company has been forced to stop selling a product because of alleged MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 3, 2012 10:56 AM ET
Who are the 1% who are sucking up half the world's cellular bandwidth?
It's tempting to blame -- as many headline writers have -- Apple's (AAPL) newest iPhone and its voice-activated personal assistant for the fact that 3% of mobile users now consume 70% of the world's bandwidth, up from 40% in 2009.
After all, the iPhone 4S with Siri consumes nearly twice as much data as the iPhone 4 and nearly MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 6, 2012 7:16 AM ET
Apple is selling iPhones as fast as it can make them, but that may not be fast enough
A pair of analyst reports Tuesday warn that Apple (AAPL) may be having trouble feeding the demand for iPhones in advance of the holiday selling season.
In a note entitled "Limited near-term upside for iPhone," Rodman & Renshaw's Ashok Kumar alerted clients that low yields on an unidentified "key component" is likely to constrain production MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Nov 29, 2011 6:59 AM ET
Apple's latest gadget sets a new launch weekend record
Apple (AAPL) announced Monday that it sold more than 4 million iPhone 4S units between 8 a.m. Friday and 12 midnight Sunday.
That's 135% better than the launch of the iPhone 4 in June 2010, and better than any analyst had predicted. The average estimate among the few who had ventured a guess was a little over 3 million.
In our poll of 4,300 MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM ET
Analysts have published estimates ranging from 2 to 4 million. What's your guess?
UPDATE: We have a winner. Apple announced Monday that the correct answer was "over four million," the guess of nearly 23% of our readers.
- - -
When the iPhone 4 went on sale 16 months ago, Apple (AAPL) sold 1.7 million in the first weekend, counting pre-orders.
The analysts who have ventured a guess seem confident that by Sunday MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 15, 2011 5:55 AM ET
|Five things you didn't know about Bernie Madoff's epic scam|
|Homeless college students seek shelter during breaks|
|Don't fight it. Bitcoin has a bright future|
|JPMorgan patents Bitcoin-like payment system|
|Victoria's Secret model wears 3-D printed wings|