FORTUNE -- When citizens have input on intellectual-property laws, they tend to favor looser restrictions over tighter ones. That's what happened with the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act, which were both killed by U.S. Congress after a loud public outcry. That would explain why corporations with financial stakes in various intellectual property, abetted by governments, prefer to work in secret to get more restrictive policies enacted through international treaties.
This week, Wikileaks published a draft of one section of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement -- the one that deals with intellectual property. It was published only to negotiators in August. At 96 pages and 30,000 words, the document "confirms the worst" fears of advocates for Internet freedom and looser copyright restrictions, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "It's not a pretty picture."
Whether or not you agree with that sentiment depends on whether you're a copyright holder.
The proposal includes language for extending copyrights to the life of the author plus 100 years -- much longer than what is now U.S. law, which is life of the author plus 70 years. Critics of such lengthy terms note that copyright law exists to provide economic incentives to create, rather than ensure that revenues flow to copyright owners for decade after decade while restricting the public's use of created works.
One notable area of pushback is on a highly controversial section of the proposed treaty that would put Internet service providers in a position to enforce copyright laws lest they be held liable. Canada and some other countries want individual countries to have flexibility as to how strict that liability should be. But the U.S. and Australia want what the EFF calls "draconian" measures that would force ISPs to filter and block Internet destinations that are alleged to traffic in pirated materials, and to enforce a "three-strikes" rule that boots customers who have been accused three times of illicitly downloading copyrighted materials.
The draft also includes new language regarding "temporary copies," an aspect of the talks that had been leaked earlier. Previous drafts of the treaty counted temporary copies as protected works, even though such copies are absolutely necessary for the basic functioning of the Internet. (For instance, when you watch a streamed video, a temporary file is created on your computer.) According to the draft, a large number of countries have now signed on to new language that would eliminate such restrictions. So far, the U.S. is not among them.
As the EFF states, the treaty is "an agreement negotiated in near-total secrecy, including corporations but excluding the public." The secrecy of the talks is similar to the secrecy surrounding trade talks across another ocean, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA. Whether the TPP remains "an anti-user wish list of industry-friendly policies" will be known only when it is completed and made public for country-by-country ratification.
Ilya Zhitomirskiy was supposed to be the next Mark Zuckerberg. He had the startup, the crowdfunding, the loyal following. And then everything fell apart.
By Matthew Shaer
FORTUNE -- At 8 p.m. on Nov. 12, 2011, a San Francisco entrepreneur named Tony Lai received a call from a number he did not recognize. Lai had recently returned from a trip to Costco to pick up party supplies -- he and a friend MOREMar 26, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Judge Koh wants a 2014 trial frozen until appeals from a 2011 complaint are exhausted
FORTUNE -- In July 2011, Motorola (GOOG) filed a complaint in Germany's Mannheim District Court charging that Microsoft's (MSFT) Xbox was infringing two of its video-coding patents. In May 2012 -- less than nine months later -- the court granted an injunction.
Contrast that with Judge Lucy Koh's federal court in the Northern District of California.
In April 2011, three MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 17, 2013 2:45 PM ET
Apple wanted the award tripled. Samsung wanted it thrown out. The Judge did neither.
FORTUNE -- After the jury turned in its verdict in the patent trial of the century -- ordering Samsung to pay Apple a record $1.05 billion in damages -- both sides submitted a long list of motions to modify or overturn one or more of the jury's findings. Two stood out:
Apple (AAPL) claimed it was entitled to MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 30, 2013 6:03 AM ET
The two sides aren't saying, but we can make some educated guesses
FORTUNE -- In Oct. 2010, Apple (AAPL) offered to license its portfolio of smartphone patents to a major Android phone manufacturer for $30 per unit -- a figure it said it was willing to reduce to $24 as part of a patent cross-licensing deal.
On Saturday, Apple announced that it had signed a 10-year cross-licensing deal -- the terms of which MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Nov 11, 2012 7:42 AM ET
If the decision sticks, one fifth of Samsung's $1.05 billion burden could disappear
FORTUNE -- It was, by several accounts, one of the patents Steve Jobs cared most deeply about.
According to his biographer, it was the clever screen trick that convinced Jobs that Apple (AAPL) could make a successful cellphone.
According to Scott Forstall, it was a deal-breaker in the company's negotiations with Samsung. "I don't remember specifics," the Apple senior vice MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 23, 2012 9:59 AM ET
Shareholders paid Thursday for Google's $12 billion acquisition of Motorola last May
FORTUNE -- We may never know for certain whether Google (GOOG) spent $12.5 billion on Motorola Mobility last May primarily because Sergey Brin and Larry Page wanted to get into the cellphone and set-top box manufacturing business or if they thought Motorola's 17,000 patents would give them some IP armor to fend off Apple's (AAPL) "thermonuclear" assault on the MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 18, 2012 4:22 PM ET
Having lost its appeal, Apple is supposed to run a public apology in 14-pt. type
FORTUNE -- Apple (AAPL) is having a tough time making the case that Samsung's Galaxy Tab is an iPad rip off. Courts in The Netherlands and Australia didn't buy it, and even the California jury that dinged Samsung $1 billion for copying the iPhone let the Tab off the hook.
But perhaps the most famous ruling in MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 18, 2012 8:34 AM ET
A company that fiercely protects its own intellectual property got caught using another's
FORTUNE -- The irony of Apple (AAPL) being accused of stealing the intellectual property of a Swiss clock designer was not lost on the tech press that had just spent a month covering the company's patent infringement suit against Samsung.
So when the Swiss railway operator SBB politely complained three weeks ago that the face of the clock app MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 12, 2012 6:46 PM ET
It was in 2006, just after he was forced to pay $100 million for the iPod user interface
FORTUNE -- "And boy have we patented it," Steve Jobs declared to laughter and applause when he unveiled the iPhone in January 2007.
The back story behind that declaration, according to The Patent, Used as a Sword, a front-page article in Monday's New York Times, was a decision Jobs made five months earlier after MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 8, 2012 7:26 AM ET
|Michaels hack hit 3 million|
|Weibo IPO leads Chinese stock invasion|
|Wealthy investors flock to fine art funds|
|Canadians arrest a Heartbleed hacker|
|Heartbleed bug affects gadgets everywhere|