FORTUNE -- When Judge Lucy Koh last month ordered a new trial to determine the proper damage award for 14 of the 28 Samsung devices found by a jury last summer to have infringed Apple (AAPL) patents, nearly every reporter covering story followed Reuters' lead:
Almost lost in the flood of "Apple setback" headlines was the lone voice of FOSS Patent's Florian Mueller, who pointed out that what was being described as a drastic cut in a $1.05 billion award could, in theory, turn out to be an increase.
"The second damages trial over the 14 products," he wrote at the time, "could result in a figure that is lower or higher than (or, theoretically but unlikely, identical to) the one reached by the jury in August."
One month later, his analysis has received a measure of vindication from, of all places, a late-Friday filing by Samsung's lawyers:
"Apple," they wrote, "can seek even more damages on these products in the new trial."
How did the press get it so wrong? Mueller, who writes that he sometimes feels he's swimming against a tide of anti-Apple zealotry, puts it this way:
"There are three kinds of people who are responsible for the widespread misconceptions concerning a 'slashing' or likely reduction of the damages award:
For Samsung, even March 2014 is too early for Apple's case against the Galaxy S3
FORTUNE -- When we reported last September that that Apple (AAPL) had added Samsung's flagship Galaxy S3 to a patent infringement suit scheduled to go on trial in March 2014, some readers thought the trial date was typo.
After all, Apple had filed this second suit -- not be confused with the one that ended in August MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 8, 2013 8:12 AM ET
Apple wanted the award tripled. Samsung wanted it thrown out. The Judge did neither.
FORTUNE -- After the jury turned in its verdict in the patent trial of the century -- ordering Samsung to pay Apple a record $1.05 billion in damages -- both sides submitted a long list of motions to modify or overturn one or more of the jury's findings. Two stood out:
Apple (AAPL) claimed it was entitled to MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 30, 2013 6:03 AM ET
Having lost its appeal, Apple is supposed to run a public apology in 14-pt. type
FORTUNE -- Apple (AAPL) is having a tough time making the case that Samsung's Galaxy Tab is an iPad rip off. Courts in The Netherlands and Australia didn't buy it, and even the California jury that dinged Samsung $1 billion for copying the iPhone let the Tab off the hook.
But perhaps the most famous ruling in MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 18, 2012 8:34 AM ET
|Microsoft unveils new Xbox One game console|
|Army plans to launch a reality TV show|
|Apple grilled about tax havens|
|Make $30 an hour, no bachelor's degree required|
|The market doesn't lie: Housing recovery is real|