FORTUNE -- Apple wanted $380 million. Samsung said it owed no more than $52 million. On Thursday, after a six day trial and a couple days of deliberation, a jury awarded Apple (AAPL) $290 million -- about 75% of what it asked for.
So ends the partial retrial of Apple v. Samsung, the patent infringement trial that resulted in August 2012 with a record $1.05 billion judgment against Samsung.
That figure has since been through several iterations. In March, the judge in the case vacated damages on 14 products -- representing $450 million of the total award -- because of errors made in the jury form. She ordered a new trial on that portion of the $1.05 billion.
In April, when Apple pointed out that the judge had also made an error, she backtracked a bit. The new trial -- the one that just wrapped up -- would determine damages on 13 products, representing $400 million of the original award.
According to AllThingsD's Ina Fried -- who cited courtroom sources -- Samsung now owes Apple a total of $929.83 million. That jibes with an estimate FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller made in an FAQ filed at the start of the retrial.
A second patent trial, covering some of the products Samsung has introduced in the two and a half years since Apple filed its original suit -- including the Galaxy S3 (but not the S4) -- is scheduled to begin in March 2014.
An Apple victory could result in the second largest patent infringement award in history.
FORTUNE -- If you thought that the one billion dollars a jury awarded Apple (AAPL) last year had been cut nearly in half, you may be forgiven. That's how most of the business press reported it.
What actually happened is that Judge Lucy Koh, who presided over the big Apple v. Samsung patent infringement trial last August, "vacated" $400 million MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Nov 8, 2013 8:34 AM ET
A judge can't be bothered to add Samsung's Galaxy S4 to the trial he scheduled for 2014.
FORTUNE -- U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal, who has been handling some of the case load created by the multiple patent infringement suits filed in California by Apple (AAPL) and Samsung, has a judicial metabolism better fit for the 19th century than 21st.
He's the judge who was assigned the task last year of scheduling Apple's MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jun 27, 2013 1:07 PM ET
How could the press get the effect of a judge's high-profile ruling so wrong?
FORTUNE -- When Judge Lucy Koh last month ordered a new trial to determine the proper damage award for 14 of the 28 Samsung devices found by a jury last summer to have infringed Apple (AAPL) patents, nearly every reporter covering story followed Reuters' lead:
"Apple had a major setback in its ongoing mobile patents battle with Samsung Electronics MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Apr 1, 2013 6:35 AM ET
For Samsung, even March 2014 is too early for Apple's case against the Galaxy S3
FORTUNE -- When we reported last September that that Apple (AAPL) had added Samsung's flagship Galaxy S3 to a patent infringement suit scheduled to go on trial in March 2014, some readers thought the trial date was typo.
After all, Apple had filed this second suit -- not be confused with the one that ended in August MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 8, 2013 8:12 AM ET
Apple wanted the award tripled. Samsung wanted it thrown out. The Judge did neither.
FORTUNE -- After the jury turned in its verdict in the patent trial of the century -- ordering Samsung to pay Apple a record $1.05 billion in damages -- both sides submitted a long list of motions to modify or overturn one or more of the jury's findings. Two stood out:
Apple (AAPL) claimed it was entitled to MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 30, 2013 6:03 AM ET
Having lost its appeal, Apple is supposed to run a public apology in 14-pt. type
FORTUNE -- Apple (AAPL) is having a tough time making the case that Samsung's Galaxy Tab is an iPad rip off. Courts in The Netherlands and Australia didn't buy it, and even the California jury that dinged Samsung $1 billion for copying the iPhone let the Tab off the hook.
But perhaps the most famous ruling in MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Oct 18, 2012 8:34 AM ET
|Homeless college students seek shelter during breaks|
|GM names Mary Barra as new CEO|
|Financial regulators unveil long-awaited Volcker Rule|
|Snowden docs had NYTimes exec fearing for his life|
|America's economic mobility myth|