By Sanjay Sanghoee, contributor
FORTUNE -- At almost $338 a share, Netflix (NFLX) stock has surged more than fourfold since the start of last year. Next week, the video streaming company is expected to report earnings for the final quarter of 2013, but before investors get too excited, they should take a deeper look at the company.
Netflix's subscriber base and revenues have grown rapidly, but its offerings don't justify the hype surrounding its service, and its licensing philosophy could eventually lead to the company's decline. According to analysts, the rapid rise and current price level of Netflix stock suggests that the market is expecting the company to increase its domestic subscriber base from 30 million to 60 to 65 million in the long term, representing 57% to 62% penetration of broadband households. That's aggressive, not least of all because other streaming services like Amazon (AMZN) and HBO GO, with subscriber counts of 10 million and 28 million respectively, will also be expanding their share of that finite pie at the same time.
Despite the bullish outlook, the stock may be overpriced, and the higher number of subscribers that analysts have projected may never materialize.
For one, Netflix's streaming movie content is mediocre at best. The company keeps adding to its library, but the bulk of new additions are either dated or extremely obscure. It also keeps dropping popular content, such as Titanic and War Games. Netflix does occasionally bring movies back but in a wildly unpredictable way. This would be fine if the company's primary business were DVD rentals (as it once was), but Netflix wants to be the definitive gateway for digital distribution, and so its random menu of content on instant play is all the more bewildering.
Behind this disconnect is its own licensing muscle. As the company's subscriber base has grown, so has its power and stubbornness in licensing only what it wants and second-guessing the studios. The issue is not necessarily one of price but of duration. Netflix claims that it knows what its users want and therefore will keep certain content indefinitely while it licenses other movies and shows for very short periods. That might make sense in the short term, but this leads to an inconsistent user experience over time (the movie, 48 hours, keeps disappearing/reappearing so fast you would think the title referred to the license).
To be fair, Netflix's real value lies in its TV offerings. The convenience of being able to stream all the episodes of your favorite TV shows instantly without the annoyance of having to wait for multiple DVDs in the mail is extremely valuable, and so too are the original series that Netflix has rolled out recently, including House of Cards and Orange is the New Black.
Even on these fronts the company's performance leaves much to be desired. For syndicated shows, a delay of anywhere from six months to a year after a season ends before new episodes come online is a serious frustration for viewers, especially if spoilers on the Internet give away major plot points in the interim. Secondly, competitors like Amazon are also rolling out original digital content like Alpha House, which could eventually erode Netlfix's advantage in this area as well. The company will have to invest regularly in new shows just to keep its subscribers interested, which will be expensive (the company spent $160 million in 2013 for 3 shows alone).
Also catching up is Hulu, the online TV and movie distributor owned by a consortium of Disney, Fox, and NBCUniversal. With a paid subscriber base of 5 million, it carries TV offerings that are 1) more current (new episodes of five of the top six broadcast shows), 2) priced at the same level as those of Netflix, and 3) more readily available to the service because of its inside relationship with content providers. It also carries original programming, which it plans to ramp up this year.
There are also issues with the price point. The company has stated that it wants to migrate its subscribers away from DVDs and toward streaming, but that would entail having to increase its streaming fees in order to make up for lost DVD revenues. That could be extremely tough without improving the quality and timeliness of its streaming content. And even if Netflix hopes to make up the revenue shortfall through increased subscriber volume, older subscribers are unlikely to keep paying $7.99 a month for decades-old episodes of Law & Order or a cinematic masterpiece like Spaceballs indefinitely.
Investors should take all this into account, and so should Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, before the bubble bursts, or the movie ends.
Sanjay Sanghoee is a political and business commentator. He has worked at leading investment banks Lazard Freres and Dresdner, as well as at multi-billion dollar hedge fund Ramius. His opinion pieces appear in Christian Science Monitor, Time, Bloomberg Businessweek, FORTUNE, and Huffington Post, and he has appeared on CNBC's Closing Bell, MSNBC's The Cycle, TheStreet.com, and HuffPost Live on business topics. He is also the author of two thriller novels. For more information, please visit http://www.sanghoee.com
The media companies that are selling Hulu aren't bargaining over price so much as what kind of deals they can get from the new owners.
FORTUNE -- Now that all the bids are in for Hulu, the question is: What will become of the service? And the answer is: Nobody knows for sure, but it's possible that the Hulu as we know it will disappear, or at least be diminished from MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Jul 10, 2013 6:40 AM ET
Just what is Hulu supposed to be? Its squabbling, wishy-washy, half-in-half-out owners keep it from making the kinds of bold moves it needs to thrive.
By Kevin Kelleher, contributor
FORTUNE – These days, it's not enough to host digital TV programs. Companies that stream programs like Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu are moving into producing original content to win new subscribers. Lately, Hulu has been doing its rivals one better by living out a MOREApr 22, 2013 5:00 AM ET
The streaming TV service works. Consumers love it. And CEO Jason Kilar is a star. The networks that own it should be trumpeting their success. Instead, Hulu risks stalling.
By Janet Morrissey, contributor
FORTUNE -- Hulu is killing it.
Surprised? You shouldn't be. Since Hulu first helped broadcast programming escape the prison of the TV set five years ago, the Los Angeles-based venture has been on a tear. In fact, it's managed MOREAug 20, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Hulu finally comes to Apple TV; is the social web IPO window closed?
YouTube to double down on its 'channel' experiment [THE WALL STREET JOURNAL]
The company says it will put in another $200 million to market the channels as it attempts to upgrade its content from simple user-generated videos and to lure more viewers and advertising. The site has launched nearly 100 new channels so far this year, attracting talent such as MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Jul 31, 2012 12:28 PM ET
Watching TV and movies at home doesn't mean having to shell out a lot for cable. At least, not anymore.
FORTUNE -- For years, access to a large selection of TV and movie content meant shelling out for cable. If you wanted premium content from channels like HBO or Showtime, there were extra fees, and if you sought to record those shows via DVR, you paid more still. When all was MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Mar 20, 2012 11:23 AM ET
Jobs invited Leslie Moonves to help him disrupt show business. Moonves passed.
"I told Steve, 'You know more than me about 99 percent of things but I know more about the television business.' "
That's Leslie Moonves, CEO of CBS (CBS), recalling a meeting with Steve Jobs last year.
Jobs was trying to talk him into providing TV shows and movies for a subscription content service Apple (AAPL) was assembling.
Moonves declined, according to MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 11, 2012 7:19 AM ET
Netflix, Hulu, and YouTube are pouring resources into original content. Now, Amazon may be, too.
FORTUNE -- Netflix, Hulu, and YouTube are all betting big on original content. Now, Amazon may be doing the very same.
At least that is what appeared to be the case for a fleeting few hours March 6 on LinkedIn. Joe Lewis, a new executive with the tech giant based in Los Angeles, briefly listed his title as MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Mar 6, 2012 7:49 PM ET
Fortune's curated selection of newsworthy tech stories from the last 24 hours. Sign up to get the newsletter delivered to you every day.
* Demand for the iPhone 4S may be higher than many had anticipated. According to All Things D, Apple (AAPL) reportedly asked Pegatron Technology to manufacture five million more iPhone 4S units than the originally contracted 10 million. (All Things D)
* Google's (GOOG) third quarter revenues surpassed predictions, with $9.72 billion. The MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Oct 14, 2011 3:30 AM ET
Yes, it has to evolve or die. But lost in the drama over its recent bold moves is a big change that cuts directly to the core of its brand.
By Kevin Kelleher, contributor
FORTUNE -- Credit Netflix with this much: It knows how to stay ahead of the game. In the Internet industry today, you either thrive by making bold and original moves, or you languish as you struggle to ape MORESep 27, 2011 11:56 AM ET
|Stocks: It's report card time on Wall Street|
|5 people you might not tip (but should)|
|Pope Francis challenges the free market - The Buzz|
|General Mills reverses course on right to sue after backlash|
|Americans have fallen in love with real estate once again|