By Kevin Kelleher, contributor
FORTUNE – These days, it's not enough to host digital TV programs. Companies that stream programs like Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu are moving into producing original content to win new subscribers. Lately, Hulu has been doing its rivals one better by living out a financial soap opera worthy of a multi-episode series.
Here's the latest drama going on at the company: Hulu, the digital-TV initiative backed by Disney (DIS) and News Corp. (NWS), appears to be moving closer to a sale. In the latest development, Guggenheim Partners, a global financial firm managing $170 billion in assets, was hired by Hulu to advise it on a sale of the company, according to Reuters.
A flurry of recent media reports have indicated that a number of entities are interested in buying Hulu: Yahoo (YHOO) and Amazon have reportedly kicked its tires. Disney may buy out News Corp., or vice versa. Peter Chernin, who helped set up Hulu when he was at News Corp., bid $500 million for the company through his media-holding company.
And as Reuters reported, there may even be a bid from Guggenheim Digital Media, an investing unit of -- that's right -- Guggenheim Partners, the same company hired to advise Hulu on a sale. Guggenheim Digital is headed by Ross Levinsohn, who recently served as Yahoo's interim CEO and who earlier oversaw digital media as an executive at News Corp.
There's plenty of backstory to this soap opera. In 2007, Hulu was first developed by News Corp. and NBC Universal as a place to host their online TV content. At the time, pirated TV shows were frequently uploaded to sites like YouTube, prompting endless rounds of Whack-a-Mole with takedown notices. Worse, under Google (GOOG), YouTube was emerging as a successful video business that was beginning to negotiate with networks for content, and Apple's (AAPL) iTunes store and Netflix (NFLX) were emerging threats as well.
Big media, mindful of what happened to music sales after the labels were slow to respond to the rise of digital music, wanted to take control of their digital-video destiny. For News Corp and NBC, that meant a company that was at first unnamed, then tentatively named Newco and quickly nicknamed ClownCo in the press. Christened Hulu in the summer of 2007, the company formally launched the following March.
Having dual owners who compete in the cutthroat media industry sowed the seeds of problems that are entangling the company today. Disney became a part owner in 2009, and NBC gave up corporate control of the company after it was acquired by Comcast (CMCSA). Lately, News Corp. and Disney have bickered over things as fundamental as business models. The former wanted to focus on subscriptions, the latter on advertisements.
Early on, Hulu shook off its status as an old-media joke with a single move: Hiring Jason Kilar as CEO. Kilar had spent nearly a decade at Amazon (AMZN), where he shepherded the bookseller's entry into videos and DVDs and later oversaw the company's North American media business as well as newer initiatives like Marketplace, community, and media storage.
Kilar silenced critics by building a company with a creative culture and a video interface that compared to Netflix's in its simple, useful design. Hulu's revenue increased 60% to $420 million in 2011 and grew another 65% to $695 million last year. Suspicions that the company was losing money were confirmed when Disney reported an equity loss in its investment in a filing last November.
In 2010, Hulu was expected to go public in a post-recession market that was warming to web companies. Late in the year, it shelved its IPO plans, but in 2011 it hired Guggenheim as an advisor after receiving an unsolicited bid to buy the company. Reports at the time said that Yahoo was the interested buyer (back when Ross Levinsohn was at Yahoo.) After nobody showed interest in the $2 billion price tag, Hulu's owners reconsidered and took the company off the block. Instead, Hulu again signaled it would go public.
An IPO never came about, but Providence Equity Partners, another early investor, sold a $200 million stake to the company last October. That amount was double the $100 million Providence invested in Hulu in 2007 for a 10% stake, and the deal valued Hulu again at $2 billion.
Under Kilar, Hulu has grown at a rate that is respectable among startups, but the joint owners of News Corp. and Disney have hobbled its potential growth. Kilar pushed to build a service that would resonate with couch potatoes in a competitive market. But News Corp. and Disney seemed more interested in preserving their traditional business models. Kilar wanted News Corp. and Disney to invest more money in content -- Hulu spent $500 million last year, Netflix is spending $2 billion a year -- but the two giants balked.
Few were surprised when Kilar stepped down as CEO earlier this year along with Hulu's CTO Rich Tom. Hulu named insider Andy Forssell as an acting replacement. Given the uncertainty facing the company's future, it may be some time before a permanent CEO can be hired.
That uncertainty is the dilemma haunting Hulu in April 2013. Just what is it supposed to be? It's on track to become a billion dollar business this year -- not bad for an Internet startup forged in an alliance of big media giants known for strangling them. But its owners keep pulling it into different directions. It's a popular site with 3 million subscribers, but if the company is indeed sold, it's not clear that current owners will let it have the golden egg: next-day access to their TV programs (hence Chernin's lowball $500 million bid, a quarter of Hulu's internal valuation).
In a digital-video market where everyone from Apple to Google to Amazon to Netflix is angling for control, Hulu already has what most of them want: a strong footing. In some respects, Hulu is Netflix's most credible rival. In other respects, it's the anti-Netflix. Netflix CEO Reed Hastings built his company by taking bold risks. Hulu's squabbling, wishy-washy, half-in-half-out owners keep it from making the same kinds of bold moves needed for it to thrive.
A Hulu sale to a bigger company with plenty of financial resources could change that, except for one thing. Hulu's current owners also provide the TV shows and movies that make up its most valuable content, and those companies may soon take that content with them -- or demand higher licensing fees -- if they lose control of the company.
Hulu was launched as a digital TV company that wasn't supposed to threaten old media. Instead, it's Hulu that's now threatened by traditional media giants. And that could mean an unhappy ending to this long-running soap opera.
The streaming TV service works. Consumers love it. And CEO Jason Kilar is a star. The networks that own it should be trumpeting their success. Instead, Hulu risks stalling.
By Janet Morrissey, contributor
FORTUNE -- Hulu is killing it.
Surprised? You shouldn't be. Since Hulu first helped broadcast programming escape the prison of the TV set five years ago, the Los Angeles-based venture has been on a tear. In fact, it's managed MOREAug 20, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Hulu finally comes to Apple TV; is the social web IPO window closed?
YouTube to double down on its 'channel' experiment [THE WALL STREET JOURNAL]
The company says it will put in another $200 million to market the channels as it attempts to upgrade its content from simple user-generated videos and to lure more viewers and advertising. The site has launched nearly 100 new channels so far this year, attracting talent such as MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Jul 31, 2012 12:28 PM ET
Watching TV and movies at home doesn't mean having to shell out a lot for cable. At least, not anymore.
FORTUNE -- For years, access to a large selection of TV and movie content meant shelling out for cable. If you wanted premium content from channels like HBO or Showtime, there were extra fees, and if you sought to record those shows via DVR, you paid more still. When all was MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Mar 20, 2012 11:23 AM ET
Jobs invited Leslie Moonves to help him disrupt show business. Moonves passed.
"I told Steve, 'You know more than me about 99 percent of things but I know more about the television business.' "
That's Leslie Moonves, CEO of CBS (CBS), recalling a meeting with Steve Jobs last year.
Jobs was trying to talk him into providing TV shows and movies for a subscription content service Apple (AAPL) was assembling.
Moonves declined, according to MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 11, 2012 7:19 AM ET
Netflix, Hulu, and YouTube are pouring resources into original content. Now, Amazon may be, too.
FORTUNE -- Netflix, Hulu, and YouTube are all betting big on original content. Now, Amazon may be doing the very same.
At least that is what appeared to be the case for a fleeting few hours March 6 on LinkedIn. Joe Lewis, a new executive with the tech giant based in Los Angeles, briefly listed his title as MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Mar 6, 2012 7:49 PM ET
Fortune's curated selection of newsworthy tech stories from the last 24 hours. Sign up to get the newsletter delivered to you every day.
* Demand for the iPhone 4S may be higher than many had anticipated. According to All Things D, Apple (AAPL) reportedly asked Pegatron Technology to manufacture five million more iPhone 4S units than the originally contracted 10 million. (All Things D)
* Google's (GOOG) third quarter revenues surpassed predictions, with $9.72 billion. The MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Oct 14, 2011 3:30 AM ET
Yes, it has to evolve or die. But lost in the drama over its recent bold moves is a big change that cuts directly to the core of its brand.
By Kevin Kelleher, contributor
FORTUNE -- Credit Netflix with this much: It knows how to stay ahead of the game. In the Internet industry today, you either thrive by making bold and original moves, or you languish as you struggle to ape MORESep 27, 2011 11:56 AM ET
At this point, the ultimate fate of the beleaguered Internet company is anybody's guess. But here are some of the executives that may get a chance at taking the top spot.
FORTUNE -- It's impossible to guess who might be Carol Bartz's replacement at Yahoo because it's impossible to guess what Yahoo might look like when a replacement is named. It could be a totally different company before a CEO is MOREDan Mitchell, contributor - Sep 8, 2011 2:39 PM ET
Fortune's curated selection of the day's most newsworthy tech stories from all over the Web. Sign up to get the newsletter delivered to you every day.
"I am very sad to tell you that I've just been fired over the phone by Yahoo's Chairman of the Board. It has been my pleasure to work with all of you and I wish you only the best going forward. Carol / Sent from my iPad" -- former MOREJP Mangalindan, Writer - Sep 7, 2011 3:30 AM ET
|Wall Street tries to buck global sell-off|
|4 federal agencies to shut Friday|
|Chrysler jabs Tesla over loan repayment|
|Who's the killer employee under Obamacare? No. 50 or 51?|
|Japan plunge spooks global markets|