Technically, it was Hudson Square's Daniel Ernst. But we have a few caveats.
Eyebrows were raised in October 2010 when Daniel Ernst hiked his 12-month Apple (AAPL) price target from $300 a share to $500. But perhaps drawing attention to himself was the point. The senior analyst at Hudson Square Research is now a regular contributor on CNBC and his current price target -- $700 -- is once again the Street's highest.
With Apple passing the $500 mark in early trading Monday, you might think Ernst had earned bragging rights for making the first $500 per share call.
But a look at his track record on Apple suggests otherwise. Not only did his Oct. 2010 price target bear no relation to the numbers in his spreadsheet, but of all the analysts who follow the company, his published estimates have proved to be among the worst. Over the past five quarters, his average error on earnings and revenues are second only to Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty for the magnitude of their misses. Four days after his famous $500 call, he finished last in our quarterly Earnings Smackdown and got singled out in the write-up:
"We're not sure what to say about Hudson Square's Daniel Ernst, who took first place in gross margin by a rounding error but came in dead last in revenue and EPS and missed the iPhone number by 4.6 million units."
Finally, we should point out that Apple didn't actually reach $500 within the 12 months of Ernst's price target. (On Oct. 14, 2011 shares closed just over $422.)
According to Terry Gregory, who tracks such things at AAPLInvestors.net, credit for the best 12-month calls might be shared by Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster and Ticonderoga's Brian White, who on Jan. 19, 2011, set price targets of $484 and $550, respectively.
Or, depending on when Apple actually hits $500 per share, credit might belong to Evercore's Robert Cihra, who set his 12-month $500 target on April 21, 2011.
For the record, Bullish Cross's Andy Zaky, a blogger who is not part of the Wall Street establishment, wrote an item for Fortune.com two days before Cihra's note in which Zaky predicted Apple would soon be trading above $500, although he thought it would happen before the end of 2011. See Why Apple's shares are dirt cheap.
Approaching Apple from another angle, Asymco's Horace Dediu noted last May that while the share price seems to bear no relation to earnings growth, it has for the past three and a half years been highly correlated to the company's holdings in cash and marketable securities. In September he posted a chart that showed Apple hitting $500 when cash per share reached $100. On Friday he posted a follow-up. "With current cash per share reaching $95 to $100," he wrote, "it seems that the share price should be around $500 any time now."
But an amateur -- a Romanian mathematician teaching in Paris -- nailed the numbers
This story never gets old.
An army of Wall Street analysts, backed by the computing power of some of the world's richest banks and brokerage houses, have once again been out-foxed and out-analyzed by rag-tag bunch of bloggers, amateurs and independent investors.
A glance at the chart at right, which lists the 48 analysts we polled in advance of MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jul 20, 2011 4:19 AM ET
Mean analyst estimate: 7.9 million. The amateurs, as usual, are more bullish than the pros
Apple (AAPL) is scheduled to report its fiscal third quarter earnings on July 19, a week from today, and in preparation for our quarterly earnings smackdown we've been gathering estimates from the small army of analysts -- profession and amateur -- who follow the company.
The biggest mystery this quarter -- and the biggest discrepancy in unit MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jul 12, 2011 6:15 AM ET
One analyst thinks so, citing unit sales, average prices and thin activity in the TV aisles
Not only has strong demand for tablet computers -- led by Apple's (AAPL) iPad -- cut into notebook PC sales, but it has started to be felt in the market for high-definition televisions.
That's the thrust of a note issued Wednesday by Hudson Square Research's Daniel Ernst. The evidence:
His weekly survey shows the average price per MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jun 22, 2011 10:37 AM ET
Some of the worst were much-improved this quarter. Others have a lot to answer for.
Although they were once again bested by the amateurs in last week's Apple (AAPL) earnings smackdown -- as they have been every quarter since we've been keeping track -- it was not all bad news for the Wall Street analysts who are paid to predict the company's quarterly results.
As the spreadsheet at right shows, most of MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Apr 25, 2011 7:29 AM ET
A sampling of Wall Street's post-launch notes
Sales estimates: Most analysts were cautious, fearing perhaps that whatever they wrote would soon be overtaken by an Apple (AAPL) press release. Most, like Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster, stuck with 500,000 units. But Baird's William Power estimated that Apple sold "roughly 1 million" the first weekend, Wedbush's Scott Sutherland "wouldn't be surprised" by that number and Global Equities Trip Chowdhry thought Apple "may have MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 14, 2011 10:52 AM ET
Unit sales estimates for the quarter that ended Saturday range from 5 million to 7.54 million
The chatter on Investor Village's AAPL Sanity board Christmas Day was mostly about who found iPads under the tree.
"My kids bought me one. Completely unexpected," wrote one investor under the heading It is going to be an AMAZING 1st qtr iPad number. "Bought my parents one. They are amazed by it. My brother-in-law bought my MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Dec 30, 2010 12:51 PM ET
|J.D. Power ranks GM tops in quality for first time|
|Fed sets road map for end of stimulus|
|Men's Wearhouse fires the 'I guarantee it' guy|
|Stratasys buys Makerbot 3-D printing company for $400 million|
|Dow sinks 200 points after Fed hints at stimulus easing|