FORTUNE -- Daring Fireball's John Gruber delivered one of his increasingly rare long-form essays Wednesday, and it's a good one.
It's structured around the three leading arguments being made these days in the media and on the Street for why Apple (AAPL) is doomed. He summarizes them as follows:
Gruber wrestles the three bears one by one, drawing on recent essays by Ben Thompson (What Clayton Christensen Got Wrong), Horace Dediu ("Apple has always been priced as a company that is in a perpetual state of free-fall"), Jean-Louis Gassée (Apple Market Share: Facts and Psychology) and Ben Bajarin (It's Tough Competing With the iPhone).
The dean of Apple bloggers lands, not surprisingly, deep in Apple's corner. Drawing on the oft-cited Mac-vs.-Windows analogy, he concludes:
The irony here is that iOS vs. Android (or, if you prefer, iPhone and iPad vs. commodity smartphones and tablets) is in fact a replay Mac vs. Windows — but not in the way that most who make the comparison would have you believe. Judging by its actions, Apple is keenly aware of the lessons to be learned from 20 years ago. To wit, this has nothing to do with focusing on raw market share, and everything to do with keeping the pedal to the metal on design and quality. If Apple maintains a lead over its rivals in those regards, the Mac suggests that Apple can occupy a dominant, stable, long-term position as the profit leader in the mobile market as well — a market that is already bigger than the PC market ever was, and unlike the PC market, is still growing.
For anyone concerned that Apple might in fact be doomed, it's a must read.
|Economy is improving but why doesn't it feel that way?|
|Where should you put your money now?|
|FHA to pull back on big mortgages|
|2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack|
|Boost for trade as global deal struck|