FORTUNE -- A multibillion dollar Apple (AAPL) patent infringement claim against Samsung -- its second in two years -- goes to trial Monday.
In the grand tradition of print journalism -- where your story had to hold up even as it was outpaced by events -- reporters planning to cover the proceedings filed their "walk-ups" over the weekend.
For a subject as arcane as U.S. patent law, a surprisingly wide range of opinions was expressed.
A sample of the bits that caught my eye:
Martha Mendoza, Associated Press: There are two equal sides to every story.
"Apple revolutionized the market in personal computing devices," Apple attorneys wrote in court filings. "Samsung, in contrast, has systematically copied Apple's innovative technology and products, features and designs, and has deluged markets with infringing devices."
"Samsung has been a pioneer in the mobile device business sector since the inception of the mobile device industry," Samsung attorneys wrote. "Apple has copied many of Samsung's innovations in its Apple iPhone, iPod, and iPad products."
Brian Chen, New York Times: Apple's real target is Google.
Officially, it's Apple versus Samsung Electronics in another tech patent face-off in a San Jose courtroom this week. But there is another company with a lot at stake in the case — Google.
"Google's been lurking in the background of all these cases because of the Android system," said Mark P. McKenna, a professor who teaches intellectual property law at Notre Dame. "Several people have described the initial battle between Samsung and Apple as really one between Apple and Google."
Daisuke Wakabayashi, Wall Street Journal. This trial is going to be harder for Apple to win.
In the first trial in 2012, Apple set its sights on Samsung, accusing the South Korean electronics conglomerate of making products that copied the look and feel of the iPhone and iPad. A jury ruled for Apple, and Samsung was ordered to pay Apple $930 million in damages. Samsung is appealing that verdict.
"Apple had an easier story to tell in the first trial, because it could hold up the phones and say, 'Look how similar that they are,'" said Mark Lemley, an intellectual-property attorney and law professor at Stanford University. Mr. Lemley is representing Google in an unrelated case.
This time, Apple claims Samsung violated patents for detecting data in messages and converting them into a link that can be clicked, background syncing of data, universal search used in its Siri voice-recognition digital assistant, an auto-complete feature that suggests words as a user is typing, and the "slide to unlock" feature.
Samsung says all but "slide to unlock" are Android features.
Florian Mueller, FOSS Patents: Apple demand for $2 billion is way over the line.
Apple's damages theory for the trial ... is an objective insanity, and I say so even though Judge Koh allowed Apple to present it to the jury.
A damages expert will argue on Apple's behalf that, if the parties had acted reasonably and rationally in a hypothetical negotiation, Samsung would have agreed to pay $40 -- forty dollars! -- per phone or tablet sold as a total royalty for the five patents-in-suit, which relate to (but don't even fully monopolize) the phone number tapping feature, unified search, data synchronization, slide-to-unlock, and autocomplete.
$40 per unit. For five software patents. Give me a break. Reality distortion would be a total understatement for this.
Daniel Eran Dilger, AppleInsider: Samsung's strategy is to claim all patents are over valued.
So while Samsung is making a case to the public that both it and Apple have lots of patented technologies in the mobile arena that differentiate their respective products, the reality is that for its second trial, Samsung had to go out and buy a defense using patents others had filed nearly twenty years ago. At no point over the last twenty years has either of those patents ever differentiated Samsung's products.
Samsung is also highlighting that it doesn't expect much in the way of damages from its pair of acquired patents. It's only asking for total damages of around $7 million from Apple, in stark contrast to Apple's demands of around $2 billion. Samsung's new legal strategy therefore seems to be aimed at attacking the entire notion that patents have any real value at all.
That's a tactic that, if successful, could enable Samsung to continue to appropriate Apple's patented, differentiated features at very low cost, even if Apple keeps initiating new lawsuits and keeps winning awards from juries, a process that takes years to wind its way through the courts.
Joel Rosenblatt and Adam Satariano, Bloomberg: Apple is playing a public relations game.
[Brian] Love, the Santa Clara law professor, said the struggle Apple faces to win its ultimate objective, a sales ban, begs the question of why the company is pursuing the second case. While the products at issue are newer, they will be "relics" by the time, years from now, Apple wins any injunction, he said.
Apple has argued that a sales ban is required to stop Samsung from trying to market products that are "not more than colorably different" from those already found to have copied Apple's technology.
Love said the litigation may serve a public relations purpose.
"It seems like there is almost a marketing aspect to the case in that Apple is trying to send a message through all this litigation that 'We're the true innovators in the smartphone world, and everyone else is riding our coattails,'" Love said. "If that's their goal, it's kind of hard to put a dollar value on that."
Ina Fried, re/code: A guide to the patents at issue.
Apple is suing over five patents.
U.S. Patent 5,946,647 — System and method for performing action on a structure in computer generated data, the so-called "quick links" patent.
U.S. Patent 6,847,959 — Universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system, a patent that Apple claims is central to universal search.
U.S. Patent 7,761,414 — Synchronous data synchronization amongt devices, or what Apple calls its "background sync" patent.
U.S. Patent 8,046,721 — Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image, the so-called "slide-to-unlock patent."
U.S. Patent 8,074,172 -– Method, system and graphical user interface for providing word recommendations, or the "word suggestions" patent.
Samsung, meanwhile, is countersuing over two patents.
Many combatants fought the smartphone wars. Most are bleeding money.
FORTUNE -- Two sets of stats came out this week that should give the smartphone also-rans pause.IDC estimates that 95.7% of fourth quarter smartphone shipments originated either with Samsung (78.1%) or Apple (17.6%). Raymond James' Tavis McCourt estimates that in the broader market for mobile phones of all varieties -- smart and dumb -- Apple captured 87.4% of the industry's profits and Samsung 32.2%.
So MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Feb 13, 2014 7:17 AM ET
Slowing Galaxy S4 sales helped push operating profits down 6% year over year.
FORTUNE -- Samsung had warned investors two weeks ago that there was bad news coming on the smartphone front. But the timing of Friday's quarterly earnings call -- one business day before Apple (AAPL) is scheduled to release its Christmas iPhone sales numbers -- could have been better.
Samsung no longer provides unit sales data, but Daewoo Securities estimates that the MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 26, 2014 10:32 AM ET
You get 47% more usable storage on a comparable Apple iPhone 5C, a new study shows.
FORTUNE -- No 16 GB smartphone on the market actually delivers 16 GB of usable storage, but some come closer than others.
Of the eight models evaluated by the British product-testing charity Which?, Apple (AAPL)'s iPhone 5C scored the highest with 12.6 GB (79%) of free memory.
The worst: Samsung's Galaxy S4, with only 8.56 GB (53.5%).
Where did the MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jan 23, 2014 2:24 PM ET
AlphaWise survey data through Sept. 15 catches early interest in iPhones 5C and 5S.
FORTUNE -- Apple (AAPL) had only just begun taking iPhone 5C pre-orders Sunday when Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise Smartphone Tracker closed the books on Q3 2013, but the survey had already registered a bump in buyer interest in the company's line of smartphones.
According to a note to clients posted early Wednesday by Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty, the survey's data suggest MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Sep 18, 2013 6:24 AM ET
Where are the video bloggers raising questions about Samsung's decline?
FORTUNE -- Did you miss the report Monday about the Samsung Galaxy S3 that caught fire in the pants pocket of a Swiss teenager, sending out shoulder-high flames and inflicting second- and third-degree burns on her right thigh?
I'm not surprised. These things can happen in any device powered by lithium-ion batteries, and the news of such incidents tends to fly under the MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Jul 9, 2013 11:13 AM ET
Google Trends says Apple beats low expectations, Samsung momentum stays strong.
FORTUNE -- Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty unveiled a new crowdsourced forecasting tool Tuesday. As explained in an April whitepaper, the AlphaWise Smartphone Tracker is based on an analysis of Google Trends, using different search terms for different regions and adjusting for seasonal trends.
The results of the first month's survey of the U.S., U.K., German, French, Japanese and Chinese markets are shown in the chart above.
As MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 22, 2013 7:09 PM ET
But Samsung isn't falling behind the iPhone as fast as it was in February or March.
FORTUNE -- Google's (GOOG) Android, at 52%, took the largest share of U.S. smartphone sales in the three month period (Jan. - Mar.) covered by comScore's report Friday. But it managed to lose 1.4 percentage points sequentially, while Apple (AAPL), at 39%, gained 2.7.
In the Apple vs. Samsung competition, Apple widened its U.S. lead, which MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - May 4, 2013 10:56 AM ET
The race may be closer than you think
FORTUNE -- Lacking hard numbers (because Samsung doesn't release them anymore) most analysts assume that the bulk of the Korean manufacturer's mobile sales come from its low-end phones. According to Raymond James' Tavis McCourt, Samsung's high-end Galaxy line outsold the iPhone only once -- in the summer of 2012, when many of Apple's (AAPL) customers were holding out for the iPhone 5.
Thanks to Barrons' MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 16, 2013 3:21 PM ET
Apple will get its second day in court, but must narrow its claims to Samsung's benefit
FORTUNE -- "I don't know if we need two cases on this," Judge Lucy Koh told attorneys for Apple (AAPL) and Samsung last month. She was referring to two suits Apple filed against Samsung in her U.S. District Court alleging infringement of two sets of patents by two sets of Samsung devices.
Apple won the first case, MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 9, 2013 11:55 AM ET
|Water becoming more valuable than gold|
|Will 7 Apples a day keep the bears away? - The Buzz|
|Don't assume you're safe from Heartbleed|
|Tesla finds friends in the FTC|
|Ex-Wal-Mart CEO Duke retired with $140 million|