FORTUNE -- In the fable, the cottagers are too impatient to wait for the goose to lay its golden eggs one at a time. So they open it up, thinking that way they'll get all the gold at once.
"Here's the problem," he wrote last summer in The Innovator's Curse. "If a company produces a string of successes, the conventional wisdom is that the chances of another success are precisely zero. A company is valued based on its cash flows and foreseeable improvements to them. What it's not valued on is its innovation flows (and foreseeable improvements to them)."
The goose analogy came up again last week in an episode of the Cubed Podcast that brought together three of my favorite mobile industry analysts: Dediu, Benedict Evans and Ben Bajarin.
The problem with Apple's valuation, Bajarin said in Cubed Episode 010: The Process of Innovation, is that the Street thinks Steve Jobs was the goose that laid the Apple II, Mac, iPod, iPhone and iPad. And now he's dead.
Not so fast, said Evans. Like golden-egg laying, making innovative products is a process, one that Apple worked out three decades ago.
"Apple," he continues, "has always been about product fit and finish and the user experience and not going below a certain level of quality in order to hit price points where there's a market opportunity.
"In the days of the PC industry, the model didn't work because that wasn't how PCs were bought. They were predominantly bought by corporate buyers who wanted 500 with a certain number of features and at a certain price. The computers were going to go under the desk so the buyers didn't care what they looked like. They were never going to be reconfigured after they were bought, so the buyers didn't care what the user experience was.
"So Wintel had market share and Apple didn't.
"We've now come around to the smartphone and the tablet world. Products are bought in line with Apple's values, with the way that Apple tries to make products.
"So part of the reason Apple has been winning for the last 10 years say is that the market came around to where Apple was -- rather than Apple creating out of thin air some amazing product that nobody could have conceived of before."
That rang true to Dediu. Me too.
You can follow Dediu at Asymco.com and The Critical Path. Evans blogs at ben-evans.com. Bajarin is the director of consumer technologies at Creative Strategies and writes for Time.com. Their Twitter handles are @asymco, @benedictevans and @BenBajarin.
Props to Daniel Eran Dilger for discovering the power of "flexibly adaptive logic"
FORTUNE -- Ben Bajarin's "reality distortion" theory about why Wall Street doesn't get Apple (AAPL) -- first published in Time Magazine's Techland last week -- has been widely picked up by numerous Apple watchers (including this one). But nobody has had more fun with it than Daniel Eran Dilger, a regular (and relatively straightforward) contributor to AppleInsider who likes to let MOREPhilip Elmer-DeWitt - Mar 13, 2013 8:35 AM ET
|America's economic mobility myth|
|Stocks: Where to make money in 2014|
|Snowden docs had NYTimes exec fearing for his life|
|Treasury closes the book on GM bailout with final stock sale|
|Victoria's Secret model wears 3-D printed wings|