James Gosling, who is often called the Father of Java, has been chiming in on the recent litigation between Oracle and Google.
There are some alternative narratives that are noteworthy in Gosling's recent blog posts. Namely that Google's Android project was started as more of a defense against Apple (AAPL) rather than a new revenue opportunity for Google (GOOG). He recalled meetings with Google when the two companies were discussing licensing Java for Android:
Money was, of course, also an issue between Sun and Google. We wanted some compensation for the large amount we would be spending on engineering. Google did have a financial model that benefited themselves (that they weren't about to share). They were partly planning on revenue from advertising, but mostly they wanted to disrupt Apple's trajectory, and Apple's expected entry into advertising. If mobile devices take over as the computing platform for consumers, then Google's advertising channel, and the heart of its revenue, gets gutted. It doesn't take much of a crystal ball to see where Apple is going, and it's not a pretty picture for Google or anyone else.
Android was purchased by Google in 2005, two years before the iPhone was even introduced. But this theme has been played before... More
|5 reasons why Yahoo is making a $1.1 billion mistake|
|Yahoo buys Tumblr, promises to not 'screw it up'|
|Tesla's fight with America's car dealers|
|Amateur investors tap 401(k)s to buy homes|
|JPMorgan shareholders ready to grill the board|