Apple 2.0

Covering the business that Steve Jobs built

The DOJ's antitrust case against Apple Inc. in 81 slides

June 3, 2013: 7:43 PM ET

The best ones, curiously, had nothing to do with Apple.

Screen Shot 2013-06-03 at 6.06.45 PM

Calls between "publisher defendants" between December 2009 and January 2010. Where's Apple?

FORTUNE -- If U.S.A. v. Apple Inc. were decided on the basis of opening day PowerPoint presentations, the government could have rested its case before the first witness was called.

The Department of Justice's visual presentation (see link to pdf below) was like something you'd expect from Apple (AAPL). The slides were simple, to the point and thoughtfully laid out. Companies were logos. Alleged conspirators were business cards with heads shots. And when the narrative called for incriminating e-mails to be quoted, the key sentences were called out and blown up big enough to be seen from across a crowded court room.

Apple's presentation was like something you'd expect from a government agency. The slides were humdrum, the text was too small to read, and whoever was running the show had trouble projecting the right image at the right time.

To be fair to Apple, the heart of its defense is a legal argument about the purpose and the language of U.S. antitrust law that doesn't lend itself to so easily to visuals.

But that's another story. See The DOJ is arguing the facts. Apple is arguing the Law.

Link: U.S. v. Apple et al Opening Slides 6-3-2013

Join the Conversation
About This Author
Philip Elmer-Dewitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Editor, Apple 2.0, Fortune

Philip Elmer-DeWitt has been following Apple since 1982, first for Time Magazine, and now on the Web for

Email | @philiped | RSS
Current Issue
  • Give the gift of Fortune
  • Get the Fortune app
  • Subscribe
Powered by VIP.