Apple 2.0

Covering the business that Steve Jobs built

Mike Abramsky's bad Apple advice

February 8, 2009: 1:12 PM ET

Apple post AbramskyA lot of Steve Jobs watchers were surprised three weeks ago when Mike Abramsky of RBC Capital Markets downgraded Apple (AAPL) to "underperform" and lowered his price target from $125 a share to $70. (link)

The stock, which opened at $84.3 that Friday, slid to $78.2 the following Monday, a 27-month low.

That bearish report -- which cited Jobs' recently announced medical leave -- was especially troubling to anybody holding Apple shares because Abramsky's track record is pretty good. He gets five stars out of five on Yahoo Finance's Star Analyst list, based on the accuracy of his Apple earnings estimates over the past two fiscal years.

And although he didn't do as well when the company released quarterly earnings the following week -- Abramsky undershot Apple's Q1 revenue by $367 million and its EPS by a full 30 cents ($1.48E vs. $1.78A) -- his estimates for sales of Macs, iPods and iPhones were uncannily accurate. See Apple Q1 earnings: Analyzing the analysts.

So how would investors who followed Abramsky's guidance have fared?

Not so well. The stock has been on a tear lately, climbing 27.5% in the past three weeks to close at $99.72 on Friday. Anybody who sold short the Monday after Abramsky's downgrade, hoping to cash in when the stock hit $70, would have lost his or her shirt.

Abramsky, for his pains, was a co-recipient of iPhone Asia's second Dean Wormer award, named for the "Animal House" academic famous for the quality of his advice (e.g. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.")

But he's certainly not the only expert out there advising folks to stay clear of this stock.

If you're looking for a healthy dose of Apple FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt), you could do worse than to pay a visit to Paluxo.com, whose report Saturday on Apple as a short-term investment quotes Cabot Wealth Advisory analyst Timothy Lutts ("it's highly likely that the stock's best days are over") and TheStreet.com director of research Colin Gillis ("The good news is out, so what's coming next? Most likely it's going to be a bad." ). See Short Term Stock Trading: Should You Buy Apple (AAPL)?

Many long-term investors in Apple, on the other hand, have been richly rewarded. The same report notes that Apple's gain from its 2003 low to its Dec. 2007 high was 3,090%.

Join the Conversation
About This Author
Philip Elmer-Dewitt
Philip Elmer-Dewitt
Editor, Apple 2.0, Fortune

Philip Elmer-DeWitt has been covering Apple since 1982, first for Time Magazine, and now on the Web for Fortune.com.

Email | @philiped | RSS
Featured Newsletters

Every morning, discover the companies, deals and trends in tech that are moving markets and making headlines.

Receive Fortune's newsletter on all the deals that matter, from Wall Street to Sand Hill Road. SUBSCRIBE

Covering the digital giants of Silicon Valley and beyond, an in-depth look at enterprise companies, and the startups disrupting them. Emailed twice weekly.

Anne Fisher answers career-related questions and offers helpful advice for business professionals.

Company Price Change % Change
JPMorgan Chase and C... 36.24 0.45 1.26%
Microsoft Corp 30.21 -0.27 -0.89%
General Electric Co 18.40 -0.20 -1.08%
Ford Motor Co 10.15 -0.17 -1.65%
Sprint Nextel Corp 2.47 -0.03 -1.20%
Data as of May 15
Index Last Change % Change
Dow 12,632.00 -63.35 -0.50%
Nasdaq 2,893.76 -8.82 -0.30%
S&P 500 1,330.66 -7.69 -0.57%
Treasuries 1.78 -0.01 -0.62%
Data as of 6:59am ET
Most Popular
Harvard and MIT launch edX to offer free online classes
 
Facebook raises IPO range to $34-$38 a share
 
GM to stop advertising on Facebook
 
Keystone isn't the only pipeline
 
Businesses are recovering, but Washington didn't help
 
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.